End abuse of loving fathers by false allegations.

Washington DV Press

Protecting Victims of the Domestic Violence Industry

Washington DV Press header image 1

2013 Doug Bartholomew DOH Settlement UPDATED

March 2nd, 2013 · Doug Bartholomew and Associates, DV Courts, DV Industry, DV News

Washington State Department of Health (DOH) release a stipulated settlement yesterday March 1st, 2013. Outlined in this agreement DVPT Provider Doug Bartholomew MSW must pay a substantial fine to the DOH, restitution to his victim, and no that is not the woman making the false Domestic Violence claims but the real victim the father, subject himself to multi year long supervision by the DOH, refrain from EVER conducting another “Domestic Violence Evaluation” and he wil NEVER again represent himself as a “Expert”.

In the months leading up to this finding Doug has presented to the DV Community who once looked to his as one of the most respected DV experts in the State that he was “tired” and public scrutiny so heightened he was getting out of the Domestic Violence services. Bartholomew has know about this investigation for some time, it was ongoing for almost two years, his statements to associates were mere attempts to deflect damage away from what he knew he could no longer hide from, PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY. I am sure to some degree he was able to convince some like Annette Pooley, Tracee Parker, Dave Vandergrift, Dale Todd, likely most of King County Superior Court Family Court Services employee’s like Daryl Buckendahl and Rachael DelVillar that his career path change was all due to one man or his group of followers, these documents debunk that as a lie.

 

3-01-13 DOH Statement of Allegations

2011 Doug Bartholomew Handbook Chapter 1

3-01-13 DOH Informal Disposition

 

If Doug is or ever has been associated with your case these documents are a must read, and should be introduced into your case. If any of the findings sound familiar to his work with you redress may exist with the Department of Health, more information can be found here.

It does appear that Mr. Bartholomew has started a new journey in life, one of personal accountability and acceptance of responsibility for his actions, at least with respect to the pain and suffering he caused this father, will he do the same for you? I don’t know but it is worth engaging in the process to see if he will like the courageous father in this case.

Good luck on your path to making amends to all the many men you have caused so much pain and suffering to over the many years Mr. Bartholomew, I promise you I will be right there beside you helping the transition.

The complete Doug Bartholomew history can be found here Doug Bartholomew Complete Unabridged History.

 

Update May 1st, 2013-

Just when it appeared Bartholomew was taking accountability for his misconduct and abuse he shattered that dream and brought us back to Bartholomewland where the gaslighting shines the path. On April 30th, 2013 Bartholomew along with his wife Kathy petitioned for Protection under Chapter 7 of the United State Bankruptcy Code. Protection from who you may ask? well that would be the citizens of the state of Washington and the Victim of Bartholomew’s abuse, you see above the DOH findings of misconduct require Bartholomew to pay the State $5000 in professional fines, $2900 refund of Professional fees charged to the victim, and the staggering sum of $69,000 the victim had to spend to defend against the Bartholomew report.

 

This was all too much for Bartholomew who claims to make $6600 each month, sadly Doug needs additional guidance to get back onto the path of enlightenment and a good dose of  DOJ inflicted Bankruptcy Fraud prosecution is in order here.

Here are the filings for his current BK and his past BK-

4-30-13 Bartholomew BK Case Summary

4-30-13 Bartholomew BK Deadlines and Hearing Schedule

4-30-13 Bartholomew BK Docket

4-30-13 Bartholomew BK Filing Douglas

4-30-13 Bartholomew BK History

4-30-13 Bartholomew BK List of Creditors

4-30-13 Bartholomew BK Parties

4-30-13 Bartholomew BK Preferred Mailing List

2013 DOR Business License for Kathy Bartholomew

 

→ 1 CommentTags:

Henry J. Pierman II August 1, 1967 – January 20, 2013

February 8th, 2013 · DV Industry

My good friend Henry Pierman passed away at his home in Issaquah on January 20th of this year. Henry was a CPA with his office on Mercer Island.

A memorial service will be held at 1pm on Feburary 9th, 2013 at FLINTOFTS Funeral Home 540 East Sunset Way Issaquah, Washington 98027, their phone number is 425-392-6444.

 

 

Rest in peace Henry, you will be missed.

→ 2 CommentsTags:

Case Study: Nyoka Michelle Jeffrey

August 16th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Industry, King County Superior Court

This Case Study is the first in a series which will focus on a variety of people with one common denominator, they all are Bailiff’s for King County Superior Court Judges. Nyoka M. Jeffrey is the bailiff for appointed Judge Theresa Doyle, the Assistant Chief Criminal Judge for the Court. Virtually every criminal case tried in King County will come across Doyle’s desk, and as the Bailiff Jeffrey has access to all case files sealed or otherwise.

In February 2002 Jeffrey found herself facing a warrant for her arrest and a demand for $10,000 bail money at the request of KC Deputy Prosecutor Andrew King-Ries, the charge Malicious Mischief 2nd Degree- Domestic Violence. According to the Seattle PD incident report on December 5th, ’01 Jeffrey went to the home of victim Kyle Hair (his mother’s home in the Rainier Valley).

Although Jeffrey and Hair have a son in common, the purpose of this visit from Jeffrey was to see the victim, after knocking on the door Jeffrey started hitting the victim with her hands and arms, whilst spewing profanities at him. The victim was busy defending himself by sacrificing his body from this assailant’s repeated blows. Witness accounts have Jeffrey continuing her verbal assault until she was instructed to leave the property.

As Perpetrator Jeffrey was leaving she is quoted as threatening the victim by saying “I’ll leave but you better watch your car” (a 1998 Mazda 626), turns out it was not a threat as Jeffrey proceeded to her car and retrieved a Baseball Bat from her car and made good on her threat of violence, she repeatedly struck the victims car causing serious damages. She then quickly fled the scene of the crimes. The record does not indicate that Jeffrey was involved in any sporting activities such as baseball which would explain her need to carry a baseball bat in her car, this author suspects the bat served Jeffrey’s intended purpose, fear and violence.

The victims family expressed deep concerns for the victims safety and sought the help of Law Enforcement and Judicial intervention to stop what they called the perpetrators “Pattern of Domestic Violence”, suggesting even treatment for DV and/or Restraining Orders.

On April 29th Perpetrator Nyoka Jeffrey with the assistance of counsel Victoria Freer entered a plea of Guilty to Malicious Mischief 3rd Degree-Domestic Violence.  Superior Court Pro Tem Judge Kenneth Comstock signed a Order deferring the sentence on May 31st placing Jeffrey on Probation for 24 months, restitution to the victim, and that she “shall commit no criminal offences”.

Only five months later in November of 2002 and Nyoka Jeffrey found herself in trouble with the Law, she was charged with Misdemeanor Theft by the Seattle City attorney under cause #428370 on December 24th Jeffrey appeared in court and sought a public defender without entering a plea.  Jeffrey seems to have then ignored this criminal charge and failed to appear for future hearings resulting in a bench warrant being issued for her arrest,  in April ’03 she finally returned to court and entered a plea of Guilty to the charge of Theft.

The day after Nyoka Jeffrey appeared in court on the Theft charge, Christmas day 2002 she was arrested and placed into custody for Domestic Violence Assault, Reckless Endangerment, and Property Destruction under Seattle Municipal Court Cause #431921. Jeffrey failed again to make required court appearances in this case but evaded another bench warrant, she entered into a plea agreement which she plead Guilty to Assault and the reckless endangerment and property destruction charges were dropped. She was Ordered to attend a Anger Management class, in Washington this involves a two day class. There is no indication this self professed Domestic Violence Perpetrator ever received the appropriate 12 month long state certified DV Perpetrator Treatment.

Back to Superior Court Jeffrey went after these DV Guilty findings as she violated the Court Order issued by Judge Comstock cause number 02-1-00905-9 SEA revoking the suspended sentence and imposing a 1year Suspended Sentence on the conditions Probation continue and additional community service is performed. Order was signed August 19th, 2003.

But the story does not end there, in February 2005 Nyoka Jeffrey finds herself in Police Custody once again. This time facing Domestic Violence Assault Charge (Seattle Municipal Court #465024) after spending 15 days in Jail and entering a “Not Guilty” plea she was released. The victim again Kyle Hair. A NCO (No Contact Order) was entered to protect the victim in this case, he however petitioned the court some 45 days later to drop the NCO which the court granted. This case drug along until July ’06 when the city dropped the charges claiming “proof problems” or lawyer speak for the victim no longer wanting to participate in the prosecution.

Now that is out of the way fast forward, Nyoka Jeffrey has now found herself a good job, that is serving as a Bailiff for King County Superior Court Judge Theresa Doyle who’s average day is comprised of churning out the hundreds of criminal arraignment hearing conducted in Superior court every month. Judge Doyle is a politically appointed Judge (one of many, many here in King County). Doyle also sits on trials and hearing in a recent ruling on the double murder case of Micheal La Rosa she recently ordered forced medication be administered, look for coming story on this case as it is clear King County Superior Court is engaging in every activity they can to shift blame away from Judge Richard McDermott and Commissioner Meg Sassaman.

KCSC has historically refused to answer any public records requests, but one will be sent out concerning the standards required for employment and if any background check are performed prior.

Any and all comments should be directed to KCSC Presiding Judge Richard McDermott at  richard.mcdermott@kingcounty.gov Chief Criminal Judge Ronald Kessler at ronald.kessler@kingcounty.gov assistaint Presiding Judge Palmer Robinson at palmer.robinson@kingcounty.gov

 

Bloody Hands on this go to-

Nyoka Michelle Jeffrey – Nyoka.Jeffrey@kingcounty.gov

Judge Richard McDermott – Richard.McDermott@kingcounty.gov

Judge Ronald Kessler – Ronald.Kessler@kingcounty.gov

Judge Theresa Doyle – Theresa.Doyle@kingcounty.gov

 

→ 1 CommentTags:

Doug Bartholomew’s new “Treatment” for Non Abusers

August 15th, 2012 · Doug Bartholomew and Associates

This email came a few months ago and finally it is being posted. Doug Bartholomew is officially branching his business out to include non violent and non controlling men. This is really nothing new as he has been falsely labeling men for decades now in the context of the Civil DV allegation arena.

 

From: Doug Bartholomew [mailto:doug@doug-bartholomew.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:41 PM
Subject:

Dear Colleagues

 I would like to take a moment of your time to let you know about a new service I am providing which has evolved to meet an unmet need in the community.

To explain the situation, domestic violence intervention was intended and designed originally to address assaultive behavior, which, when done correctly as part of a coordinated community response, works well for the target behavior.  Over the years the target has expanded to, first, abusive but non-assaultive behavior, then controlling behavior and now it has expanded to include a whole range of non-physical, non-controlling behavior.  However, the further we have gotten from the original intent of the intervention, the less effective we have become at creating change.

In the last few years, and especially the last few months, I have been getting an increasing number of referrals of individuals who have no criminal charges and are not alleged to have been assaultive and may not even be accused of attempting to control their intimate partners, but who have engaged in emotionally abusive behavior or behavior which resulted in emotional distress in their partners.

·         one man became bitter and withdrawn after the loss of his business and became angry and judgmental if his wife wanted to talk to him until she finally left “until you get better”

·         another man committed more or less constant boundary violations until his wife was a nervous wreck

·         another man was so judgmental of his wife that she felt hated and left him

·         and a lot of people who just want to be better husbands and fathers and not be feared by their loved ones.

The behavior which resulted in these situations would be a part of a good domestic violence program, but would not be the focus of such a program.

[Read more →]

→ 3 CommentsTags:

Justice for all, well maybe for some…….

July 20th, 2012 · DV Industry

Imagine, the Courts – who are supposed to be unbiased, interested in Justice, are complaining that a new law proposed would now require that they consider all evidence under the already existing Rules of Evidence.  In other words, they don’t consider evidence correctly now, and don’t want the legislature to make them start doing it now?  And why?  It makes the hearings too long.   What – aren’t we looking for one thing – Justice?   It puts too much of a burden on Pre Se’s?   No, only on false accusing Pro Se’s!!!!     Are these Judges worthless?   Yes, I believe they are and they are a disgrace to their positions.  Remember these Names – Madsen and Wickham!

 

→ 5 CommentsTags:

King County Presiding Judge Richard McDermott

April 9th, 2012 · DV Industry

More evidence KCSC Presiding Judge Richard “Dick” F. McDermott Jr has failed the citizens of King County. WADVPress has known for a few years of the practice of KCSC Judges and Commissioners have of naming private “For Profit” providers as part of civil case and custody cases, but now it seems they have gone too far.

Commissioner Les Ponomarchuk ordered a father accused of Domestic Violence to attend Domestic Violence Perpetrator Treatment with a specific private provider, David Vandegrift this father contacted me inquiring about him, it took all of 15 seconds to determine that Mr. Vandegrift is not has has not been certified (as required by Washington Law RCW 26.50) since December of last year. Simply stated any “treatment” provided by this man would not count as DVPT, false representation and another example of the KCSC directing money to their favored providers (see Payola at King County Superior Court).

Stunned this father asked “how could the court do this to me?” this response is all to common for men or women who first encounter a King County Commissioner such as Jacqueline Jeske or Meg Sassaman (thankfully she has been moved off the DV Calendar) or any of the Half Witt Pro Tem’s such as Joan Allison. This is usually cleared up by the 3rd visit in front of one of these abusers, according to Commissioner Les Ponomarchuk “There are no RULES in DV” truer words he has never spoken. The abomination of Justice that is King County Superior Court never ceases to amaze me.

There is a ongoing search of case records right now to determine and notify the effected parties of the courts demands of attendance for DV Treatment from a provider who cannot provide such services, in effect each one of these fraudulent orders offers the litigant instant contempt for not seeking treatment from a State Certified provider, and good luck getting the Commissioner found in contempt for his or her bogus Order.

The Washington CJC issued a opinion letter on the topic of specific provider referral, they concluded that if the Judicial Officer has personal knowledge as to the character and fitness they could make such orders, so unless Les and Jackie have violated the Cannon they knew full well this provider was not qualified. The question will come very soon as to who will pay for the services the litigants thought they were getting, were ordered to get but did not, the Court Warrantied this provider so I would think the Office King County Risk Management will be getting a 100 or so new claims, figure counting the attorney bills for more trips to court each case could be $3000-$5000. all because some Commissioner thought they knew more than the truth, or because they did not think stopping Domestic Violence is worth 15 seconds of time or the potential $500k their actions could cost the Taxpayers of King County was important enough to follow the rules.

So, where does Judge Dick McDermott fit in? He is the Presiding Judge for King County Superior Court and as such his Administrative responsibilities include the Training and Supervision of the Commissioners. The Commissioners are violating litigants rights, and have created a danger to the community at large.

If you have been ordered to Dave Vandegrift or are currently in his “Treatment” program call DSHS Maureen Kelly at 360-902-7901 and verify his Certification Status, maybe let your Lawyer know, and maybe call Judge Dick McDermott and ask him why he violated your rights.

 

If you are in Dave Vandegrift’s program or have finished at any time in 2012 we want to hear from you.

 

Bloody Hands on this-

Judge Dick McDermott

Judge Jim Doerty

Judge Palmer Robinson

Commissioner Jacqueline Jeske

Commission Les Ponomarchuk

David Vandegrift, DOH Licensed Social Worker

 

 

 

→ 1 CommentTags:

New Domestic Violence Fact Sheet Published

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Industry, DV News

August 18th, 2010 · No Comments

The truth is slowly coming forward. And it paints a MUCH different picture than what we’ve been told by a gender-feminist driven agenda. Save Services,  Stop Abusive and Violent Environments, has published its most recent fact sheet with a solid basis this past month. It tells the truth within domestic violence. And that truth is that it takes two to tango. Most often, women instigate domestic violence, only to be claimed as the victim later. Many times, this is a tactic used within a gender biased law arena to produce a desired result. In other words, many are not true victims of DV, yet use the system to gain leverage in marital affairs and child custody cases, when the system gladly obliges them.

Here are the facts:

Fact #1: One in 10 American couples engages in intimate partner violence each year.

 

About one in 10 married and cohabiting couples experience some form of partner aggression (slap, shove, punch, etc.) each year.

Fact #2: Men and women initiate domestic violence at similar rates.

  • Over 250 scholarly studies “demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.
  • If an incident escalates, the female partner is more likely to be injured. Nonetheless, of all victims who require medical attention, one-third are male.
  • Female initiation of partner violence is the leading reason for the woman becoming a victim of subsequent violence.

Fact #3: Partner aggression is often two-way.

 

  • A Centers for Disease Control survey found that half of all partner violence was reciprocal.
  • One study of dating couples concluded that 70% of all physical abuse was mutual. [Read more →]

→ 12 CommentsTags:

CPS Corruption Game Exposed

January 30th, 2012 · DV Family, DV Industry, DV News

CPS Corruption Game Exposed

September 3rd, 2010 · 15 Comments

Confessions of a Child Protective Service Headhunter 

These dirty games have been suspected for a long, long time. False domestic violence claims are prevalent. These confessions explain how it works, … all over the country. This is not for the children, but for the government money afforded to these agencies, which will do anything to justify their existence. Thanks should be in order to those coming clean, as their lives are now in danger for speaking out. 

The following is a transcription of an audio tape from a former Child Protective Service Headhunter.  Exclusive interview provided to journalist Georgie Hampton…..part 3 of 3.(where marked (x-x), signifies the recording was unclear to transcribe)

   

My name is Black Michael and I granted way of Canada and Australia and the world my exclusive story as a retired headhunter who is trying to make amends for the over 25,000 children removed over a twenty-two year period. 

 CPS and other agencies paid me to falsify information to make these children wards of the court.  As I said last week my job was to locate families on welfare, low income, low I.Q. or the least likely to be able to afford counsel that could get them their children returned to their custody.  I was paid $1,800 per child I brought into care, with a $500.00 bonus if a child was in someway handicapped and a $10,000 bonus if a child was adopted out without parental consent. I am not proud of what I did and I am now trying to see that as many children as I can will be returned to their loving families.  This is why I am stepping forward to give testimony to what we headhunters do.  First, we located a family that fit the criteria.  Then watched that family for a circumstance that really happened, that was not really dangerous.  But, when which likely made it look likely abuse, neglect or some other endangerment was going on.  We then made written, sworn statements to the agencies we worked for and a warrant would then be issued for the child or children in that family to be removed from the family home.  [Read more →]

→ 20 CommentsTags:

Tacoma DV Advocate China Fortson Violates Custody/Ethics Law

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Industry, DV News

Tacoma DV Advocate China Fortson Violates Custody/Ethics Law

July 14th, 2010 · 3 Comments

We’ve been saying this for years now. Looks like it’s finally catching up tot hem down in Tacoma, for this is what happens behind that curtain of confidentiality. And, it’s a shame as true victims could have been helped with these resources. Much more oversight is needed.

Tacoma employee’s role in custody battle leads to ethics case

Did the City of Tacoma’s top advocate for domestic violence victims act responsibly to protect a woman who reached out using false allegations to escape the escalating abuse of an estranged husband?

Or, did Gloria China Fortson, acting on unfounded abuse allegations, butt into a custody battle, overstep her authority and misuse city funds to help the woman break the law?

A city investigation last year found the latter, concluding that the longtime victims’ advocate broke city ethics rules in 2007 by helping a client leave the state with her children.

In the midst of a custody dispute, a judge had granted Keisha Jackson’s request to take her children to visit her ailing father in Florida with one condition: That she return within three weeks. Instead, Jackson – driving a van rented with city funds by Fortson – absconded with her children and was gone for more than seven months.

“I had no clue where they were,” said Kelvin Jackson, the ex-husband who had court-ordered visitation rights to his children. “It was the worst time in my life.”

Seven months later, after police in Florida finally caught up with Keisha Jackson, arrested her and sent her back to Washington, it was Fortson who was there to bail her out.

What’s more, after city officials received a complaint to look into Fortson’s conduct, the city’s investigator questioned why Fortson even intervened in a case that amounted to a bitter, if complicated, separation and custody battle.

Despite the findings of the city investigation, Fortson has stayed on the city payroll as she appealed – maintaining that she acted to protect a victim and her children. On Monday, a city hearing examiner is scheduled to hear the case.

The investigator reviewed court records and police reports and interviewed local cops, but found scant evidence that domestic violence alleged by Keisha Jackson actually occurred to justify Fortson’s involvement.

Although city officials have noted that criminal abuse charges are not required to receive domestic violence services – so as not to discourage victims from seeking help – the investigator concluded: “Evidence fails to substantiate that domestic violence issues regarding Mr. Jackson ever existed and further indicates Keisha Jackson’s representations of such as self-serving in the context of a custody dispute.”

The case could have broader implications for Tacoma’s Domestic Violence Advocacy Program and the way services for victims are handled in a city deeply scarred by the issue.

Fortson, 54, who goes by her middle name, China, did not respond to repeated requests for comment. She has denied wrongdoing and has criticized the findings as irresponsible.

In an affidavit last year, she characterized the city’s investigation as “full of suspicion, guesswork and assumptions,” adding that the findings are “highly prejudicial to me personally as well as to … domestic violence education efforts on the part of the City of Tacoma.”

Steve Downing, Fortson’s attorney, described his client as “an extraordinary, outstanding, nationally recognized domestic violence advocate, and I don’t want to see her portrayed as anything less than she is.”

“I’ve got to wonder, are they out to get her?” he added. “Are they out to kill the domestic violence program in the city of Tacoma?”

AUDIT FINDS PROBLEMS

Kelvin Jackson says the case exemplifies why an overhaul of the program is needed. He contends that his wife trumped up her domestic violence claims to manipulate the system and obtain free legal advocacy – and did so with Fortson’s help.

“There need to be changes,” Kelvin Jackson said, “starting with China and her supervisor.”

Some changes already have been made. A separate city audit of the program, sparked in part by Fortson’s ethics probe, found several problems with supervision and spending. It has resulted in new and improved accounting systems, policies and other corrective action, city officials say.

And if the ethics violation is upheld, more change is likely: Fortson – the only full-time domestic violence project specialist the city has known – could be fired. The decision would fall to City Manager Eric Anderson.

In the meantime, she remains working in her $61,000-per-year job. Anderson and John Briehl, Fortson’s boss and director of the city’s Human Rights and Human Services Department, could have suspended Fortson pending the appeal’s outcome. Neither would specifically comment on the case while the appeal runs its course.

“I can’t for the life of me understand how she can still be employed in the same capacity after all this,” Kelvin Jackson said.

During the course of his court battle, Jackson, who ultimately won custody of his daughter and received $29,000 from the city to settle a claim he filed over the case, repeatedly had complained to Fortson’s supervisors about her conduct in the case beginning in late 2006.

But it wasn’t until a deputy Pierce County prosecutor sent a complaint to Anderson in May 2008 that the city opened a formal ethics investigation.

Weeks earlier, Deputy Prosecutor Grant Blinn had charged Keisha Jackson with two counts of felony custodial interference after she was arrested in Florida on a warrant. She was extradited and had been booked into the Pierce County Jail – until Fortson paid the $250 bond to bail her out.

“I thought this just kind of stinks,” Blinn recently recalled. “My primary concern was taxpayers’ dollars were being used to post bail for criminal defendants.”

Blinn’s letter to Anderson also questioned whether Fortson’s perceived friendship with Keisha Jackson had crossed professional boundaries. Whether personal or strictly professional, that relationship began when the Puyallup woman walked into the Crystal Judson Family Justice Center four years ago, claiming she feared for the safety of herself and her children.

ABUSE ALLEGATIONS

It had been over 18 months since Keisha Jackson had lived with Kelvin, when she came to the Judson center in August 2006.

The couple had served in the Army and married in 1992, even though Keisha had yet to divorce her first husband, records show. Kelvin left the home in early 2005, and Keisha filed for separation later that year. In court, each parent sought custody of their two children – a 13-year-old son and 9-year-old daughter Quiymani.

Meeting with a caseworker at the Judson center, Jackson alleged that her husband was abusive and that she feared him.

In a recent interview with The News Tribune, Keisha Jackson said the abuse began when the couple were still together and continued after they parted.

“He was continuously bullying me, harassing and stalking me, but the court wasn’t even much paying attention to what I was saying,” she said. “He would also be mean to my children – push them down, call them names, things like that.”

The pastor at her church suggested she go to the Judson center “because what I was experiencing was domestic violence,” Jackson said. “I didn’t even know that what I was going through was domestic violence.”

The Judson center caseworker soon called in China Fortson, records show.

Fortson, a graduate of The Evergreen State College with a long community service record, had helped to launch the city’s Domestic Violence Advocacy Program in 1998. As the city’s lone full-time victims advocate, Fortson serves about 350 people per year, providing them help with legal aid, food and shelter, among other things.

Although the city generally limits its domestic violence advocacy service to residents only, case-by-case exceptions have been made. After Tacoma Police Chief David Brame fatally shot his wife and then killed himself in 2003, the city stepped up its domestic violence resources and collaboration, including joining with the county to fund the Crystal Judson Family Justice Center, named in honor of Brame’s wife. The city’s DV program now works in concert with the center and the YWCA, serving victims across Pierce County.

“The world of domestic violence does not know limits, and therefore we provide reciprocity between jurisdictions,” Briehl is quoted as telling a city investigator in 2008. “… Sometimes we need to offer our services to nonresidents.”

As the couple’s custody case dragged on into late 2006, a new figure began to show up at hearings and visitation exchanges on behalf of Keisha Jackson.

“I was very confused,” Kelvin Jackson recently recalled of his first encounter with China Fortson. “Who was this person, and why was she involved?”

CUSTODY BATTLE

When his estranged wife brought only his daughter to the Thanksgiving holiday weekend visitation exchange in 2006, Kelvin Jackson said he confronted her: Where was his son? He claimed Keisha Jackson responded by screaming at him that the boy didn’t want to see him.

Later, Jackson said, an unknown woman called and told him his son was old enough to make his own decisions.

“I told her that’s ridiculous,” he recalled. “He was 13 years old.”

Jackson said that when he pressed the woman about who she was, China Fortson quickly told him her name, misrepresented herself as a “CPS” (Child Protective Services) worker, then became verbally abusive and hung up on him. Jackson later documented his phone conversation with Fortson in a court affidavit and in complaints to her supervisor.

Jackson and Tonya Dran, his then-girlfriend who attended the child exchange, each filed affidavits soon after, alleging Keisha Jackson had violated the court’s parenting plan by not bringing her son to the visitation exchange.

Fortson later said Kelvin Jackson had “attack(ed) my integrity” when she filed a four-page court declaration and 70 pages of exhibits to rebut his allegations and raise questions about his character.

Among the items filed was a 2004 Lakewood police report alleging Jackson had embezzled money from his former employer. Six months earlier, prosecutors had decided not to charge Jackson because of “insufficient evidence,” Chief Deputy Prosecutor Mary Robnett recently said. Fortson’s filings made no reference to the decision.

Fortson also included civil records showing Jackson and his girlfriend had delinquent tax judgments, and a state social worker’s report that opined Jackson had “played a large role in the trauma and chaos” surrounding his family.

“Mr. Jackson(’s) credibility would seem to have a few flaws in it,” Fortson wrote.

By late 2006 and into early 2007, Kelvin Jackson had filed several complaints to Fortson’s supervisor at the city’s Human Rights and Human Services Department. His e-mails complained that Fortson had lied to him, harassed him, given damaging advice to his children and abused her authority.

“I never got a single response,” he said.

At least some of the complaints were logged into the city’s complaint system, records show. Fortson responded to one in January 2007, writing to her boss that Jackson’s claims were lies. Kelvin Jackson was an abuser, Fortson wrote. It was her job to help protect his wife and kids.

And if Jackson continued to complain and “harass my supervisor,” she added, “I will be force(d) to get a anti-harassment order against him.”

VISIT TO FLORIDA

In June 2007, Pierce County Superior Court Judge Susan Serko decreed the Jacksons’ marriage invalid and issued a parenting plan. It called for daughter Quiymani to primarily live with her mom and gave liberal unsupervised visitation rights to her father. Both parents received equal authority in making major decisions.

Custody issues involving the son – who lived with his mom and hadn’t seen his father for seven months – were to be resolved later, pending counseling reports.

Notations in the final order signed by the judge also showed that Serko wasn’t convinced by Keisha Jackson’s domestic violence claims. Under the “Parental Conduct” and “Other Factors” sections of the plan’s form – areas that trigger restrictions on parental rights if domestic violence is found to exist – the order reads: “Does Not Apply.”

Less than two months later, Keisha Jackson returned to court, seeking permission to take her children to visit her cancer-stricken father in Florida. If allowed, the trip meant Quiymani would miss at least one scheduled visitation with her dad.

Kelvin Jackson argued against his ex-wife’s request.

“I don’t trust the fact that she’s going to go to Florida and come back,” he told Serko, according to hearing transcripts.

Jackson said he feared that once there, Keisha would file paperwork to make her three-week trip permanent.

Serko decided to allow the trip – with one condition.

“Keisha Jackson shall return to the state of Washington with the children no later than September 3rd, 2007,” she ordered.

But by Sept. 5, Keisha Jackson still hadn’t left Washington.

“The day we were supposed to leave, all the transmission fluid from my car conveniently disappeared,” Jackson recently said, implying her ex-husband was to blame.

Records show she did not contact the court to seek to modify the judge’s order. She did call Fortson for help.

Fortson paid $204 to put Keisha and her children up for two nights in a SeaTac hotel and paid $267 to rent a van for Jackson to drive to Florida, records show. She later claimed reimbursements from the city for “victim relocation.”

Both women have since claimed that Kelvin Jackson was making threats that were escalating, requiring Fortson to take action.

On Sept. 7 – four days after the judge’s deadline for returning – Keisha Jackson left in the van rented by Fortson. Joining her was her daughter, Quiymani, and a 14-year-old disabled niece in her care. The son and Keisha’s 17-year-old daughter from a previous marriage separately took a bus.

Jackson initially stopped in Mississippi, where she enrolled Quiymani in school, records show. Later, she took the children to Florida, where they stayed variously with their grandfather and a neighbor, records show.

By late January 2008, it was clear Keisha Jackson intended to make her stay permanent. She filed papers in a Florida court seeking child support, custody and a protection order against Kelvin Jackson.

THE BAILOUT

In March 2008, Blinn, the deputy prosecutor, obtained a warrant for Keisha Jackson and habeas corpus writs to return the Jackson children to Washington.

On March 28, 2008, after Keisha Jackson appeared in a Florida court for a protection order hearing, deputies arrested her for suspicion of felony custodial interference. She was extradited to Washington three weeks later, and booked into the Pierce County Jail.

Meantime, Kelvin Jackson still couldn’t find his children. “I knew they were in Florida,” he said, “but I didn’t know where.”

In fact, his son was living at his grandfather’s home while Quiymani lived with a neighbor.

“My mom didn’t want us to talk to our dad,” Quiymani recalled. “I was afraid to call.”

But with her mother jailed in April 2008, Quiymani finally asked the woman she lived with to call her dad.

“I missed him.”

Soon, the girl was on a flight bound for Sea-Tac Airport.

Blinn recalls speaking with Fortson on the phone shortly after Keisha Jackson’s arrest. Fortson seemed “irritated and unprofessional” when telling him that Kelvin Jackson had an extensive history of abuse against Keisha Jackson and others, Blinn said.

“I repeatedly reminded her it wasn’t my job to decide blame, but Ms. Jackson had violated a court order,” Blinn said he told her. “She didn’t seem satisfied with my explanation.”

Kelvin Jackson later informed Blinn that Fortson had bailed out his ex-wife. Blinn later raised the issue to Jacqueline Strong-Moss, one of Fortson’s supervisors.

“I told her I’m hearing rumors that China had posted her own funds for Ms. Jackson’s bail,” Blinn recalled. “And she said, ‘Oh no, It wasn’t her personal funds. It was (taxpayer) funds.’”

“My reaction was, ‘Oh, my gosh.’ And her’s was, ‘Well, yeah, this is not that uncommon.’”

Blinn sent a formal complaint to Tacoma’s city manager.

ETHICS INVESTIGATION

In late May 2008, the city assigned risk analyst Tracy Storwick to investigate.

Meanwhile, prosecutors considered charging Fortson with custodial interference for helping Keisha Jackson violate the court order. But after Jackson agreed to plead to a reduced contempt of court charge, they opted not to charge Fortson.

“There was something that potentially could have been charged,” said Brian Wasankari, a deputy prosecutor who reviewed the case. “But given that the person (who Fortson) helped had pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor instead of a felony, it didn’t seem just to charge (Fortson) with a felony.”

On Dec. 22, 2008, Storwick issued her findings to city officials, determining that evidence “strongly suggested” Fortson had abused her authority and misused city funds to benefit Jackson.

The investigation didn’t prove Fortson had used public money to bail out Jackson. Fortson claimed the money came from outside sources – a local consortium that helps victims. The investigator determined that the bail was paid from funds in a Tapco Credit Union account in Fortson’s name but couldn’t substantiate where the funds in the account came from.

But the investigation also found that Fortson previously had used taxpayer funds to bail out at least one jailed client. That case involved paying $175 for a woman taken into custody for driving with a suspended license, records show.

In her written response to the case last year, Fortson denied using city funds for Keisha Jackson’s bail, but acknowledged “several times in the past I have bailed out clients and was reimbursed by the City of Tacoma.”

Evidence also suggested that Fortson misspent public funds for her own “personal and private convenience,” the report said, including paying off $250 in traffic tickets and fines on her husband’s car. Fortson said the fines – mostly for parking tickets – were legitimate city expenses incurred while she was attending court hearings on official business.

The report also found that Fortson likely overstepped her authority by intervening in the Jacksons’ civil case because no “clear nexus to domestic violence” existed.

Still, Storwick could not prove Fortson had broken any ethics rules, in part because her supervisors, including Briehl and Strong-Moss, knew of or authorized her actions.

Storwick “strongly recommended” the city implement better oversight of Fortson’s position. She added that the ethics probe should be reopened if new information emerged.

In early 2009, the city manager’s office remanded the case for further investigation. About a month later, after Storwick re-interviewed Fortson, she issued a supplemental report.

It found Fortson had “knowingly misused her official city position and city funds” by aiding Keisha Jackson’s illegal trip to Florida.

Storwick noted that at times Fortson changed her story and “repeatedly offered conflicting rationales” when asked who had paid for Keisha Jackson’s hotel room and rental van. Fortson also gave Storwick the wrong documentation when asked to support claims that outside state funds had covered those expenses, the report said.

Based on the evidence, Storwick reasoned that Fortson either knowingly had helped Jackson make the trip, or she had misrepresented the reason for renting the van to obtain funds for unauthorized purposes. Either way, the report found that Fortson had violated the city’s ethics code.

FORTSON FIRES BACK

In March 2009, Fortson criticized both reports as “defective” in an 18-page response.

She denied ever being Keisha Jackson’s friend, said she hadn’t misused city funds, and disputed the finding that she’d violated any ethics rules.

Fortson also denied knowing details of the court order requiring Jackson’s return to Washington. Then, she blasted Blinn and Storwick for acting irresponsibly.

“Domestic violence is not always documented,” Fortson wrote. “It would seem incredulous to me that anyone who has been through the David Brame and John Mummhoud (sic) incident and/or the efforts made by the City of Tacoma to educate its employees regarding domestic violence would end up making such bold and ridiculous statements in any official report about ‘undocumented’ allegations of domestic violence.”

Downing, Fortson’s lawyer, added that his client’s actions were within the scope of her job and noted that no one from the city even interviewed Keisha Jackson.

“How can you investigate this without talking to one of the primary people involved?” he asked.

Keisha Jackson, 40, recently insisted her abuse claims are true.

“From what I understand, it was her job to work with me the way she did,” she said. “Haven’t you seen all the women out there who complain and complain about domestic violence, and no one ever does anything and they end up dead?”

‘TIRED OF FIGHTING’

Inside an airy rambler home on a quiet Lakewood street, Quiymani Jackson, now 13, slouched into a dark sofa and recalled a city advocate who, as a 9-year-old kid, she called “Ms. China.”

“Sometimes I thought of her as a friend, sometimes as just a (case)worker,” she said.

The woman made her a flower girl in her wedding, even once bought her a pet turtle.

“I liked her,” Quiymani said.

Mani, as she likes to be called, then described her life’s upheaval three years ago, when her mom packed her and a disabled cousin into a van and headed south. She missed a lot of school, she said. She talked to a lot of counselors. Her mom coached her on what to say, she said.

“I used to have nightmares with my mom,” she said. “I always woke up crying, in the fetal position.”

Mani Jackson said her life is much better now since she came to live here, with her father, his new wife and the wife’s son. Finally, she addressed a lingering question: “My dad doesn’t beat me.”

After a second trial in late 2008, Kelvin Jackson won custody of Mani and granted his ex-wife supervised visitation.

Jackson’s son, now 17, still lives with his mom. After losing contact with his son for two years, Kelvin Jackson chose not seek custody. He said he hopes to reconnect when his son turns 18.

Earlier this year, the City of Tacoma paid Jackson $29,000 to settle a $1 million claim he brought based on Fortson’s conduct. Jackson, who removes asbestos for a living, said he isn’t happy with the city’s settlement.

“I was just tired of fighting,” he said. “No amount of money is going to take away the pain of what we’ve gone through.”

→ No CommentsTags:

The Times Are Slowly Changing, …. In California

January 30th, 2012 · DV Industry, DV News

July 13th, 2010 · No Comments

Woman jailed for making threats … to herself

By LARRY WELBORN

THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER

July 12, 2010 12:00 p.m.

SANTA ANA – A 25-year-old Santa Ana woman was sentenced to a year in jail Friday for sending hundreds of threatening text messages – to herself.

Jeanne Mundango Manunga’s criminal problem was that she blamed the harassing text messages on an ex-boyfriend and his sister-in-law, and reported them to the police.

They were arrested on false charges of making criminal threats and required to post thousands of dollars in bail. The sister-in-law was arrested three times, and spent some time in custody before she could gather enough funds to pay the bail on her third arrest.

A jury convicted Manunga of three felony counts of false imprisonment by fraud or deceit and two misdemeanor counts of making a false police report in May.

On Friday, Superior Court Judge Patrick H. Donahue sentenced Manunga to a year in jail, placed her on three years probation, told her to stay away from her ex-boyfriend and his sister-in-law, and ordered her to repay the victims about $50,000 in restitution.

Deputy District Attorney Mena Guirguis said that after Manunga and her former boyfriend stopped dating in 2008, she took out a pre-paid cell phone in his sister-in-law’s name, and started sending the threatening text messages to her regular cell phone.

Manunga then went to three different police departments on at least 19 occasions and claimed that the ex-boyfriend and the sister-in-law were behind the threats.

Her scheme was uncovered when the victims went to the phone store, talked with the salesman and learned that Manunga had bought the pre-paid phone under the sister-in-law’s name, Guirguis said.

They reported that information to a Costa Mesa police detective, but by then a third arrest warrant had been issued for the sister-in-law.

During a follow-up investigation, the detective discovered that most of the threatening text messages were sent when the pre-paid cell phone was in close proximity to Manjunga’s home or work, Guirguis said.

At the sentencing hearing Friday, the two victims said they were devastated about being arrested on false charges, and worried about clearing their names.

Contact the writer: lwelborn@ocregister.com or 714-834-3784

→ No CommentsTags:

More Restraining Orders Gone Wild

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Industry

October 1st, 2009 · 5 Comments

On September 25, 2009, Robert Franklin, Esq., of Fathers & Families appeared on the Helen Glover Show to discuss the temporary restraining order entered against Olympic and professional wrestler Kurt Angle. The interview went well.  Ms. Glover was receptive to the idea that domestic violence restraining orders can be unjust in some circumstances. Mr. Franklin’s reactions are pasted below.

September 26th, 2009 by Robert Franklin, Esq.

I did an interview on the Helen Glover Show on WHJJ AM Radio 920 in Providence, Rhode Island on Friday, September 25th. The subject was the Kurt Angle case that I posted a piece about earlier. Listen to it here (WHJJ, 9/25/09).

As you recall, Angle is the heavyweight wrestler who won a gold medal for the United States at the Atlanta Games in 1996. He had a dating relationship with Trenesha Biggers for about 10 months. Eventually, she moved into his house, but the pair drifted apart emotionally. He allowed her to remain in his house, apparently because she had nowhere else to go and not much money.

Much to his surprise, she had a restraining order issued against him, without his presence in court. He was arrested for violating it less than two hours after it was issued, even though he had no knowledge of the order. He’s been exonerated on that charge.

But the major outrage is that the restraining order allows Biggers to live in Angle’s house and use his personal property for which she has apparently paid not one thin dime. Angle, by order of the court, can’t set foot on his own property. That’s been true for almost six weeks. There is to be a hearing on September 29th at which the judge will decide whether to make the temporary order permanent. It will be Angle’s first opportunity to tell his side of the story.

That was the topic of my appearance on Helen’s show. Aside from the obvious facts about restraining orders generally, another important aspect of them came up. Not only do restraining orders have the potential to violate parental rights and children’s rights to their parents, they also violate property rights. Angle’s case shows the potential for that kind of harm in no uncertain terms.

Angle’s girlfriend established her residency there solely by receiving her mail at Angle’s address. On that basis alone, he’s been removed from his own home, temporarily and maybe permanently. Angle’s case argues loudly that at the very least judges need to make inquiry into property ownership before tossing someone out on the street. If Biggers truly needed a restraining order, the judge could have prohibited him from coming near her, which, as far as I can tell from the interview Angle gave, would have been fine with him. That way, she would have been the one to vacate the house. He could have remained living there and she’d have been safe from whatever threat Angle posed, if any.

That was the thrust of my interview with Helen Glover. She was a cordial host, very open to the criticism of restraining orders that they can violate the restrained party’s property rights.

→ No CommentsTags:

Violence Against Women Act: Promotes Immigration Fraud, Costs Taxpayers $170 Million a Year

January 30th, 2012 · DV Industry

November 19th, 2008 · 23 Comments

Take a good hard long look at the eight reasons in which this act enables the circumvention of our constitutional liberties. They also apply to us and DEFINE what is wrong with the system as it stands and WHY it is sorely in need of repair.

Title VIII of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) addresses the needs of battered immigrants. The plight of abused immigrants should concern us all. But many persons are unaware how Title VIII of VAWA is widely used to allow, even encourage immigration fraud.

VAWA Facilitates Immigration Fraud in 8 Ways

1. Provides free legal services to persons who merely claim abuse.
2. Broadens the definition of “extreme cruelty”
3. Eliminates traditional standards of proof
4. Removes the “substantial connection” requirement
5. Bans all evidence by the alleged abuser, even if it shows fraud or illegal behavior
6. Educates persons on how to take advantage of these VAWA provisions
7. Overrides deportation hearings
8. Provides a loophole for persons in the midst of deportation

Perverse Incentives

 

VAWA affords generous services, benefits, and legal rights to immigrants who falsely allege abuse. It is estimated that these services cost the American taxpayer $170 million a year. (www.mediaradar.org/docs/RADARreport-VAWA-Funded-Immigration-Fraud.pdf)

VAWA Loopholes

Under VAWA, an immigrant can merely claim to be a victim of domestic violence without providing any hard proof of abuse. In most states, domestic violence is broadly defined to include being “afraid,” “fearful,” or even mental “distress.” Anyone can claim to be fearful, and few judges are willing to deny a person’s request for a restraining order.

The immigrant then takes the ex parte restraining order — issued without any hard evidence of abuse — and uses it to “prove” that he or she is a victim of domestic violence. That person is able to file a self-petition with the USCIS to remove the temporary conditions from the Green Card.

In addition, VAWA places the responsibility for adjudicating abuse petitions with a CIS office in rural Vermont, rather than with the local Service Centers that are in the best position to investigate the abuse claims and hear both sides of the story.

The Accused has No Standing to Refute the Allegation

Under VAWA, a person merely accused of abuse is classified as a “prohibited source,” and the alleged abuser often is never informed of the allegations. If the alleged abuser does learn of the charges, VAWA forbids the USCIS from accepting evidence to refute the allegations.

That person does not even have the right to present proof to CIS officials that the immigrant entered the country illegally!

Open Disregard of Due Process Doesn’t Help Victims

The most fundamental principle of the American criminal justice system is the accused must be given the opportunity to refute an allegation of wrongdoing. But under VAWA immigration provisions, an American citizen accused of partner abuse has no legal standing to refute the claim of the immigrant spouse with the US government. In fact, the accused may not have even been informed of the allegation!

Safeguards need to be added so true abuse victims are protected without taking away the rights of an alleged abuser. Due process includes providing every American citizen the opportunity to refute a false allegation.

Widespread false claims of abuse are taking away resources from true victims. The Violence Against Women Act is in dire need of reform.

Real Life Example of VAWA Based Immigration Fraud

Elena came to the US in November 2005 from Russia on a fiancé visa. Shortly afterwards, she married her American fiancé, David. David believed he had a happy marriage and a loving wife. Elena received her Conditional Green Card in August 2005, and the marriage began to deteriorate. Elena began to complain about anything and everything. She began to sleep in her daughter’s bedroom. At times, it seemed as though Elena was trying to provoke David into a physical confrontation. After fifteen months of marriage, David decided he could not continue living that way. Since Elena had often said she wanted to go back home to Russia, David suggested that maybe it was time. Elena was outraged, and told David he would be sorry. The next day, David was served with a domestic protection order. Elena accused him of beating her, stalking her, and threatening to kill her. David was evicted from his home for the next 9 days. In court, the judge dismissed the DPO due to insufficient evidence. Fifteen months later, David was back in court for the divorce. Once again, Elena made the same allegations of abuse. Elena was unable to produce any evidence of abuse. She had no record of 911 calls, no police reports, no emergency room visits, no unexplained injuries, no witness testimony attesting to abuse, or any other evidence of abuse. Once again, the judge dismissed all allegations of abuse. The divorce was granted to David based on mutual and voluntary separation. Prior to the divorce, Elena filed an I-360 Self Petition with the USCIS. Despite being unable to produce any evidence of abuse, Elena received her Permanent Green Card. David was never contacted by the USCIS for his side of the story, and he was ignored when he reached out to them. Elena not only received her Green Card, but she received free legal assistance for the divorce, she received free legal assistance for filing the I-360, she received assistance and subsidies from the local woman’s shelter, and she received court ordered alimony. David will be paying the $55,000 financial havoc that the false allegations of abuse cost him for years to come.

Voice of American Immigration Fraud Victims

Voice of American Immigration Fraud Victims is group of American men and women who have been victimized by foreign spouses who have use of false allegations of abuse to circumvent the American immigration system. We are in favor of stopping domestic violence, and we are in favor of legal immigration. In fact, some of are members ARE immigrants.

Our purpose is to inform lawmakers how VAWA is used to deny an American man or woman his or her most fundamental due process protections when an allegation of abuse is made.

For more information, visit: www.immigrationfraudvictims.com .

→ No CommentsTags:

Judge Communications

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts, King County Superior Court

Judge Communications

> Judge Linde,

>

> This is an error in the form used by the State Prosecutor who was

> scheduled on 1-07 Seattle jail calendar, on a City of Kenmore case.

> I can contact the State Prosecutor’s office and ask them to  submit

> the

> NCO on the correct District Court form or, wait until the next hearing

> on 2-17 where the City of Kenmore Prosecutor will be present and can

> readdress the NCO.

>

> Thank you.

> Rochelle

>

> _____________________________________________

> From: Linde, Barbara

> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM

> To: McKenzie, Rochelle

> Cc: Crozier, Tricia

> Subject: FW: Protection Order Issue

>

>

> Rochelle-

> Can you help us look into this problem order attached below?  also

> please send me the docket.

>

> _____________________________________________

> From: Pompeo, Kathryn

> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:25 AM

> To: Linde, Barbara

> Subject: FW: Protection Order Issue

>

>

>

> Judge Linde and Bathum;

>

> Here is a classic issue on the enforceability of a protection order

> that

> was discussed in the Domestic Violence Initiative meeting on Tuesday,

> Jan 26 and the issue of being on the wrong form that was discussed in

> the December 2009 Protection Order Summit.

>

> We received this order from the City of Kenmore via Shoreline District

> Court today in the Data Control Unit (notice the date of the order.)

>

>   <<Suchy Protection Order 010710.pdf>>

> The form that the order was prepared on is a Superior Court Order form

> from 4/2001.  When this was pointed out to the City of Kenmore

> Prosecutor by both the KCSO Detective at the time it was issued as

> well

> as by my DV Desk Data Technician this morning both received the same

> response. “That’s the only form we have.”  My Data Technician asked if

> they had access to the internet and when he received an affirmative he

> directed them to the pattern forms website for future orders and

> requested a corrected order as soon as possible.

>

> The other issues with this pre-trial order are the terms of what

> constitutes no contact; there are no limits on the distance that the

> respondent must stay away from the protected parties, nor does it

> prohibit stalking or harassing as the current orders do.  There is no

> reference to the current RCW’s and it was issued out of a district

> court

> even though it’s on a Superior Court Form.  Nor is there any LEIS or

> other information on the respondent. (My Data Tech and I have spent

> about an hour working on this one so far to get it entered and to

> try to

> get corrected information.)

>

> I can just imagine the respondent sitting in a car in front of the

> petitioner’s house claiming she’s not contacting the person so it’s

> not

> a violation of the order or the respondent following the petitioner

> in a

> vehicle with another car in between so that again the respondent can

> claim three was no contact.  This makes it very difficult for law

> enforcement to try to enforce the order.

>

> I’m also not sure of the legality of an order being issued from one

> court with the other court’s information on it.  Luckily, my DV Desk

> Data Technician recognized the case number as belonging to a city

> court

> and checked District Court Records first.

>

>

> Kathryn Pompeo

> Supervisor-Data Control Unit

> King County Sheriff’s Office

> Office:  (206) 296-7588

> Cell:    (206)255-4954

> Fax: (206) 296-0160

> MS: KCC-SO-0100

_____________________________________________

From:       Bathum, Richard

Sent:      Thursday, January 28, 2010 12:49 PM

To:      Martin, David

Subject:      RE: DV Court Study

I would be honored!  And yes, we tightened up the time frame considerably.  I am pleased with how the system is working right now.  That was a fun meeting this morning.

_____________________________________________

From: Martin, David

Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:55 AM

To: Bathum, Richard

Subject: DV Court Study

Judge Bathum,

It was great to hear your comments this morning about DV court.  It is amazing how efficiently the court is operating (did you really say 45 days to disposition?)  I was wondering if you had a few minutes to sit down and talk about the DV Court study with Jim and I.

Sincerely,

David Martin

________________________________________________________________________

David D. Martin | Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney

Chair | Domestic Violence Unit | King County Prosecuting Attorney

W554 King County Courthouse | 516 Third Avenue |Seattle, WA  98104

Work:  (206) 296-9503 | Cell: (206) 898-9416  | Fax: (206) 205-6104

email: david.martin@kingcounty.gov

→ No CommentsTags:

A Thurston County Nightmare

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Family

A Thurston County Nightmare

January 21st, 2009 · 30 Comments

By any account, Jeremy Kanoa Hughes is a good man. He has befriended police officers in Hawaii, applied for enlistment in the army and has tried to gain custody of his child. His only mistake is that he called his ex-wife a “dirty whore” one night after he caught her cheating on him in bed. I can’t imagine what that was like, but for that, he received an assault charge in the state of Hawaii.

He was making good money working hard in the entertainment industry, which took long hours. Because of this, he handed over the bill paying duties to his ex-wife, which was a fatal error. For providing for his family and working long honest hard hours of work, his reward was a cheating wife who spent all of his money, and that assault 3rd petty misdemeanor in Hawaii.

But, that wasn’t enough to satisfy this scorned woman. She filed bogus charge after bogus charge against him, contending that he was continuously breaking a no-contact order that she had filed to gain the upper hand in their child custody battle. Women are often coached to do this to keep the man at bay for whatever reasons they deem necessary.

Finally, one day, she messed up. She fraudulently charged that he was again breaking the no-contact order. The problem was that he was with his friend, a police officer at that time. Hawaii had seen enough of her. From that point forward, even though they did not file perjury charges, the police were ordered to ignore her cries of wolf

So what did this poor woman do? Why, she moved to Thurston County, of course! Thurston County is renowned for its gender-biased policies and coddles the likes of her with forces like Judge Paula Casey.


It was a knockout blow to Jeremy. Game. Set. Match. He had no idea what was coming next. But the likes of Bruce Fischer and Joe Antole knew full well what was in store.

She took his child as well. Jeremy, in turn, filed for custody in the state of Hawaii, in the form of a subpoena so that he could at the least arrange to have visitation. The day before that hearing, She, in turn, filed a restraining order based on hearsay that Jeremy had caused her emotional distress and that he was “threatening” to remove the child from the state. Never mind the bogus charges and the history in Hawaii. She now had the full support of the prosecutor, Jennifer Weiler. As of today, Jennifer has not responded to my inquiries regarding not only Jeremy, but Bruce Fischer and Joe Antole as well.

Editor’s note. Jennifer did respond and denied even knowing first hand of this case, something which I find to be astounding based upon what happened. She informed me that she issues warrants based upon investigations. The “investigation” in this case was a phone call to verify that he had spoken with his child. That was it. Never mind that this occurred before any warrant was served. Never mind that the order in WA recognizes Hawaii’s judgments.  She “insists” that these investigations are thorough, even though evidence in this and many other cases suggest otherwise.

Nobody in Thurston County seemed to care that he had initially and honestly had issued a subpoena for her appearance to resolve the custody of his son. He had never threatened her in any way at all. But all it takes is for somebody to file a false claim and have that brought before a judge, which is exactly what she did. Her actions in Hawaii were ignored in this process. What happened next was beyond bizarre and goes to the heart of how Thurston County operates.

Early in August of 2007, a detective called Jeremy from Thurston county. He asked if he had called his son at 7PM a few days earlier, He answered yes and that he had a court order allowing him to do that The detective said thanks and that was it. He never once implied that Jeremy was being investigated for doing anything illegal or that there were any orders from Washington. In fact, he was and there were orders.

Several months later, Jeremy went to re-enlist in the military. What happened next floored him. He had an arrest warrant issued for violating a TRO when he called his son that day. Even though the restraining order was dated August 8th, 2007 and had a Hawaii court order that said he was allowed to call at 7PM, AND a Washington order stating Hawaii had precedence, Thurston County decided otherwise. He was turned down by the military until he cleared this up.

So, Jeremy called Thurston County and ran into nothing but resistance regarding this matter. He did not know that they were playing, judge, jury and executioner with him. Any normal man trying to do the right thing for his child would not see this coming. They would not give him a case number or anything, instead insisting that he show up in person. He recorded this conversation and informed them he would appear in person and see a judge regarding this matter. He was also told that he would not be arrested as it was just a investigation.

He was being set up.

So, he went to set a court date and was told to go across the hall to the sheriffs office. They took his name, handcuffed him and took him directly to the county jail, where he was finger printed, stripped, given a jump suit, and tossed into a cell with 15 convicted criminals. He was also told I had no rights to anything because I had a NO BAIL warrant and would not be released until his court date in March. They never read him his rights or stated I was under arrest, When I asked if he was under arrest they stated “no, it was an “Investigative Detention”. After he was in custody for longer than 2 days, he inquired as to why this was being done. They said because it was a violent offense and were “allowed” to hold him for up to 6 months.

This is how Thurston County treats men who legally contact their families.

It also begs the question as to who is creating and setting these illegal policies as it is illegal to hold someone for longer than two days without arresting them. Divine intervention coming from somebody powerful put an end to this part of this mess.

He was then “allowed” to go home to Oregon, but had to come back for a court date, which is all he wanted in the first place.

Jeremy is still without his son. He has no idea where he is as his ex-wife has again relocated without notifying either him or the court as to her whereabouts. She has yet to respond to the subpoena in Hawaii, and is most likely working with Thurston County on her next move.

Because the original judge in Hawaii didn’t fully trust her, he was able to obtain independent access to reports regarding his son’s doctors and teachers His son used to tell the therapist that he loved him, missed him and didn’t want to live with her. Nowadays, after all of the abuse she has heaped on him, his son’s story has reversed as she has successfully alienated him. Jeremy has noticed from these reports and what brief experiences he has with him, that his son no longer fits in and has been labeled everything from autistic to having learning disability.

Men’s rights are often trampled in these courts and especially in Thurston County. We have a good man here, who cannot obtain decent employment as he now has a “record” for legally calling his son. He cannot re-enlist in the military until this is cleaned up. And he has not seen his son in over a year and a half.

If not for the divine intervention, he would still be in jail. Bogus restraining orders are often used to arrest and detain men there. Men lose their jobs and, fall behind on child support, facing legal action or arrest by falling into RO DV traps like this.

Men of Thurston County, beware. This is how they roll.

→ No CommentsTags:

Judge Paula Casey – The Shame of Thurston County

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts

July 18th, 2008 · 7 Comments

Homeowner Stripped of Property and Home by Thurston County Judge

Press Release; July 16, 2008.
Olympia, WA

Recently, the Thurston County family court weathered a scandal related to the display of a series of inappropriate and allegedly gender biased pictures. The story was brought to you back in March on King 5 News and in the Olympian Newspaper. The “art” was removed after numerous complaints alleging an appearance of bias and potential prejudice towards men and fathers. The County Clerk’s office also removed gender biased content from their web site at the same time. Now, the judge in that story (Judge Paula Casey) is being sued by the man in the story for barring him from his home, for refusing him his lawful personal property and for leaving an abandoned property. His complaint asserts that Judge Casey is knowingly and purposely driving the home into foreclosure out of spite and to compensate local law firm her attorney fee award that is under appeal. Judge Casey was made aware the former wife had defaulted on the mortgage and abandoned the property. The man asserts the judge and the county both willfully and knowingly refused him access to the courts and a legal remedy. The man, Bruce Fischer, filed a civil law suit for damages and relief for this family court judge’s apparent punitive and retaliatory actions in effort to save his home from foreclosure and to avert unnecessary financial loss.

Read more about how the system and Judge Casey failed…..

The restraining order is not an uncommon tool in the divorce attorney’s arsenal and is very common in Thurston County Divorce court especially by women represented by Connolly, Tacon and Meserve Law Firm, the law firm representing the former wife, Karen Fischer. However, a restraining order has a purpose – Protection, if only from contrived alleged injury or fear. Nonetheless, the one issued in the Fischer case no longer serves the purpose of restraining a party from the other’s home, since the home was abandoned. Judge Casey made clear her disinterest in restoring the property awarded to Mr. Fischer and, instead, is allowing the property to be placed in jeopardy. Too, there is the known fact that Mr. Fischer is liable for the mortgage and the financial fallout. Mr. Fischer submits it to be not unreasonable to conclude the damage he is suffering out of the abuses of authority are related to his efforts to champion fathers’ rights and fairness that have been a high profile thorn in Casey’s side.

It is clear from the record that Judge Casey is intentionally barring him access to his property and home and was repeatedly made aware that his ex wife was in default before abandoning the property. “This judge lost her ability to be reasonable and fair long ago” and is now acting vindictively in an apparent pay back for Mr. Fischer bringing forth the biased artwork story to the public and for standing up for his legal rights against her unfounded rulings. “It is pretty obvious to all involved that this judge is trying to show me who is boss “, said Mr. Fischer.

“She failed to perform her proscribed duties as an officer of the court, which she took an oath to perform.” Judge Casey had an obligation to make final determinations of property and insure the community assets in her charge were not wasted. Judge Casey also failed to restore Mr. Fischer’s position based on the Public Duty Doctrine. The Public Duty Doctrine, or fireman’s clause, imposes liabilities on government entities, when they take charge of an individual or their property. “I am unsure if my house were to burn down today that it would even be covered.” “It would be a huge loss for the mortgage company and me.” The county recently lost a multi million dollar law suit due to a gender bias suit that was filed against Ed Holm and the prosecuting attorney’s office. Mr. Fischer has not declared his damages amount yet. He is waiting to see if the situation on his house is going to be rectified before naming final damages against his ex-wife, Judge Casey and Thurston County for the unnecessary and orchestrated financial harm and potential foreclosure of his home.

The Division II Appellate Court declined to intervene, last week, stating it is the job of the Supreme Court of Washington to tell a Superior Court Judge to follow the law and perform her sworn duties. The county’s only response to date has been that “they should be dismissed” from the lawsuit. No other help or actions were taken by the county officials to help this citizen who is being trampled by this judge. The County Board of Commissioners were also made aware of the situation. They made no attempt to help or respond. The county initially dismissed all of their judges and assigned a judge from a neighboring county after a critical time delay. Thurston County also refused to provide a copy of any document regarding the recusal of all Thurston Judges. Though several individuals have copies of the web page, the document apparently no longer exists and has been removed from the Thurston court index. Tampering with public records is a crime in the State of Washington.

Mr. Fischer’s Law Suit can be found under Thurston Superior Court Cause #08-2-01330-5. Ed Holm’s Prosecuting Attorney’s office is defending the county and Judge Paula Casey on public time and expense. Ed Holm is a former partner in the Connolly, Tacon and Meserve Law Firm. Judge Paula Casey’s counterpart at the Family court, Judge Thomas McPhee, is also a former partner in the Connolly, Tacon and Meserve Law Firm.

Mr. Fischer has not seen his beloved children since last year. The home is set to be auctioned for sale on August 15th.

→ 1 CommentTags: