End abuse of loving fathers by false allegations.

Washington DV Press

Protecting Victims of the Domestic Violence Industry

Washington DV Press header image 1

New Domestic Violence Fact Sheet Published

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Industry, DV News

August 18th, 2010 · No Comments

The truth is slowly coming forward. And it paints a MUCH different picture than what we’ve been told by a gender-feminist driven agenda. Save Services,  Stop Abusive and Violent Environments, has published its most recent fact sheet with a solid basis this past month. It tells the truth within domestic violence. And that truth is that it takes two to tango. Most often, women instigate domestic violence, only to be claimed as the victim later. Many times, this is a tactic used within a gender biased law arena to produce a desired result. In other words, many are not true victims of DV, yet use the system to gain leverage in marital affairs and child custody cases, when the system gladly obliges them.

Here are the facts:

Fact #1: One in 10 American couples engages in intimate partner violence each year.

 

About one in 10 married and cohabiting couples experience some form of partner aggression (slap, shove, punch, etc.) each year.

Fact #2: Men and women initiate domestic violence at similar rates.

  • Over 250 scholarly studies “demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.
  • If an incident escalates, the female partner is more likely to be injured. Nonetheless, of all victims who require medical attention, one-third are male.
  • Female initiation of partner violence is the leading reason for the woman becoming a victim of subsequent violence.

Fact #3: Partner aggression is often two-way.

 

  • A Centers for Disease Control survey found that half of all partner violence was reciprocal.
  • One study of dating couples concluded that 70% of all physical abuse was mutual. [Read more →]

→ 3 CommentsTags:

CPS Corruption Game Exposed

January 30th, 2012 · DV Family, DV Industry, DV News

CPS Corruption Game Exposed

September 3rd, 2010 · 15 Comments

Confessions of a Child Protective Service Headhunter 

These dirty games have been suspected for a long, long time. False domestic violence claims are prevalent. These confessions explain how it works, … all over the country. This is not for the children, but for the government money afforded to these agencies, which will do anything to justify their existence. Thanks should be in order to those coming clean, as their lives are now in danger for speaking out. 

The following is a transcription of an audio tape from a former Child Protective Service Headhunter.  Exclusive interview provided to journalist Georgie Hampton…..part 3 of 3.(where marked (x-x), signifies the recording was unclear to transcribe)

   

My name is Black Michael and I granted way of Canada and Australia and the world my exclusive story as a retired headhunter who is trying to make amends for the over 25,000 children removed over a twenty-two year period. 

 CPS and other agencies paid me to falsify information to make these children wards of the court.  As I said last week my job was to locate families on welfare, low income, low I.Q. or the least likely to be able to afford counsel that could get them their children returned to their custody.  I was paid $1,800 per child I brought into care, with a $500.00 bonus if a child was in someway handicapped and a $10,000 bonus if a child was adopted out without parental consent. I am not proud of what I did and I am now trying to see that as many children as I can will be returned to their loving families.  This is why I am stepping forward to give testimony to what we headhunters do.  First, we located a family that fit the criteria.  Then watched that family for a circumstance that really happened, that was not really dangerous.  But, when which likely made it look likely abuse, neglect or some other endangerment was going on.  We then made written, sworn statements to the agencies we worked for and a warrant would then be issued for the child or children in that family to be removed from the family home.  [Read more →]

→ 1 CommentTags:

Tacoma DV Advocate China Fortson Violates Custody/Ethics Law

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Industry, DV News

Tacoma DV Advocate China Fortson Violates Custody/Ethics Law

July 14th, 2010 · 3 Comments

We’ve been saying this for years now. Looks like it’s finally catching up tot hem down in Tacoma, for this is what happens behind that curtain of confidentiality. And, it’s a shame as true victims could have been helped with these resources. Much more oversight is needed.

Tacoma employee’s role in custody battle leads to ethics case

Did the City of Tacoma’s top advocate for domestic violence victims act responsibly to protect a woman who reached out using false allegations to escape the escalating abuse of an estranged husband?

Or, did Gloria China Fortson, acting on unfounded abuse allegations, butt into a custody battle, overstep her authority and misuse city funds to help the woman break the law?

A city investigation last year found the latter, concluding that the longtime victims’ advocate broke city ethics rules in 2007 by helping a client leave the state with her children.

In the midst of a custody dispute, a judge had granted Keisha Jackson’s request to take her children to visit her ailing father in Florida with one condition: That she return within three weeks. Instead, Jackson – driving a van rented with city funds by Fortson – absconded with her children and was gone for more than seven months.

“I had no clue where they were,” said Kelvin Jackson, the ex-husband who had court-ordered visitation rights to his children. “It was the worst time in my life.”

Seven months later, after police in Florida finally caught up with Keisha Jackson, arrested her and sent her back to Washington, it was Fortson who was there to bail her out.

What’s more, after city officials received a complaint to look into Fortson’s conduct, the city’s investigator questioned why Fortson even intervened in a case that amounted to a bitter, if complicated, separation and custody battle.

Despite the findings of the city investigation, Fortson has stayed on the city payroll as she appealed – maintaining that she acted to protect a victim and her children. On Monday, a city hearing examiner is scheduled to hear the case.

The investigator reviewed court records and police reports and interviewed local cops, but found scant evidence that domestic violence alleged by Keisha Jackson actually occurred to justify Fortson’s involvement.

Although city officials have noted that criminal abuse charges are not required to receive domestic violence services – so as not to discourage victims from seeking help – the investigator concluded: “Evidence fails to substantiate that domestic violence issues regarding Mr. Jackson ever existed and further indicates Keisha Jackson’s representations of such as self-serving in the context of a custody dispute.”

The case could have broader implications for Tacoma’s Domestic Violence Advocacy Program and the way services for victims are handled in a city deeply scarred by the issue.

Fortson, 54, who goes by her middle name, China, did not respond to repeated requests for comment. She has denied wrongdoing and has criticized the findings as irresponsible.

In an affidavit last year, she characterized the city’s investigation as “full of suspicion, guesswork and assumptions,” adding that the findings are “highly prejudicial to me personally as well as to … domestic violence education efforts on the part of the City of Tacoma.”

Steve Downing, Fortson’s attorney, described his client as “an extraordinary, outstanding, nationally recognized domestic violence advocate, and I don’t want to see her portrayed as anything less than she is.”

“I’ve got to wonder, are they out to get her?” he added. “Are they out to kill the domestic violence program in the city of Tacoma?”

AUDIT FINDS PROBLEMS

Kelvin Jackson says the case exemplifies why an overhaul of the program is needed. He contends that his wife trumped up her domestic violence claims to manipulate the system and obtain free legal advocacy – and did so with Fortson’s help.

“There need to be changes,” Kelvin Jackson said, “starting with China and her supervisor.”

Some changes already have been made. A separate city audit of the program, sparked in part by Fortson’s ethics probe, found several problems with supervision and spending. It has resulted in new and improved accounting systems, policies and other corrective action, city officials say.

And if the ethics violation is upheld, more change is likely: Fortson – the only full-time domestic violence project specialist the city has known – could be fired. The decision would fall to City Manager Eric Anderson.

In the meantime, she remains working in her $61,000-per-year job. Anderson and John Briehl, Fortson’s boss and director of the city’s Human Rights and Human Services Department, could have suspended Fortson pending the appeal’s outcome. Neither would specifically comment on the case while the appeal runs its course.

“I can’t for the life of me understand how she can still be employed in the same capacity after all this,” Kelvin Jackson said.

During the course of his court battle, Jackson, who ultimately won custody of his daughter and received $29,000 from the city to settle a claim he filed over the case, repeatedly had complained to Fortson’s supervisors about her conduct in the case beginning in late 2006.

But it wasn’t until a deputy Pierce County prosecutor sent a complaint to Anderson in May 2008 that the city opened a formal ethics investigation.

Weeks earlier, Deputy Prosecutor Grant Blinn had charged Keisha Jackson with two counts of felony custodial interference after she was arrested in Florida on a warrant. She was extradited and had been booked into the Pierce County Jail – until Fortson paid the $250 bond to bail her out.

“I thought this just kind of stinks,” Blinn recently recalled. “My primary concern was taxpayers’ dollars were being used to post bail for criminal defendants.”

Blinn’s letter to Anderson also questioned whether Fortson’s perceived friendship with Keisha Jackson had crossed professional boundaries. Whether personal or strictly professional, that relationship began when the Puyallup woman walked into the Crystal Judson Family Justice Center four years ago, claiming she feared for the safety of herself and her children.

ABUSE ALLEGATIONS

It had been over 18 months since Keisha Jackson had lived with Kelvin, when she came to the Judson center in August 2006.

The couple had served in the Army and married in 1992, even though Keisha had yet to divorce her first husband, records show. Kelvin left the home in early 2005, and Keisha filed for separation later that year. In court, each parent sought custody of their two children – a 13-year-old son and 9-year-old daughter Quiymani.

Meeting with a caseworker at the Judson center, Jackson alleged that her husband was abusive and that she feared him.

In a recent interview with The News Tribune, Keisha Jackson said the abuse began when the couple were still together and continued after they parted.

“He was continuously bullying me, harassing and stalking me, but the court wasn’t even much paying attention to what I was saying,” she said. “He would also be mean to my children – push them down, call them names, things like that.”

The pastor at her church suggested she go to the Judson center “because what I was experiencing was domestic violence,” Jackson said. “I didn’t even know that what I was going through was domestic violence.”

The Judson center caseworker soon called in China Fortson, records show.

Fortson, a graduate of The Evergreen State College with a long community service record, had helped to launch the city’s Domestic Violence Advocacy Program in 1998. As the city’s lone full-time victims advocate, Fortson serves about 350 people per year, providing them help with legal aid, food and shelter, among other things.

Although the city generally limits its domestic violence advocacy service to residents only, case-by-case exceptions have been made. After Tacoma Police Chief David Brame fatally shot his wife and then killed himself in 2003, the city stepped up its domestic violence resources and collaboration, including joining with the county to fund the Crystal Judson Family Justice Center, named in honor of Brame’s wife. The city’s DV program now works in concert with the center and the YWCA, serving victims across Pierce County.

“The world of domestic violence does not know limits, and therefore we provide reciprocity between jurisdictions,” Briehl is quoted as telling a city investigator in 2008. “… Sometimes we need to offer our services to nonresidents.”

As the couple’s custody case dragged on into late 2006, a new figure began to show up at hearings and visitation exchanges on behalf of Keisha Jackson.

“I was very confused,” Kelvin Jackson recently recalled of his first encounter with China Fortson. “Who was this person, and why was she involved?”

CUSTODY BATTLE

When his estranged wife brought only his daughter to the Thanksgiving holiday weekend visitation exchange in 2006, Kelvin Jackson said he confronted her: Where was his son? He claimed Keisha Jackson responded by screaming at him that the boy didn’t want to see him.

Later, Jackson said, an unknown woman called and told him his son was old enough to make his own decisions.

“I told her that’s ridiculous,” he recalled. “He was 13 years old.”

Jackson said that when he pressed the woman about who she was, China Fortson quickly told him her name, misrepresented herself as a “CPS” (Child Protective Services) worker, then became verbally abusive and hung up on him. Jackson later documented his phone conversation with Fortson in a court affidavit and in complaints to her supervisor.

Jackson and Tonya Dran, his then-girlfriend who attended the child exchange, each filed affidavits soon after, alleging Keisha Jackson had violated the court’s parenting plan by not bringing her son to the visitation exchange.

Fortson later said Kelvin Jackson had “attack(ed) my integrity” when she filed a four-page court declaration and 70 pages of exhibits to rebut his allegations and raise questions about his character.

Among the items filed was a 2004 Lakewood police report alleging Jackson had embezzled money from his former employer. Six months earlier, prosecutors had decided not to charge Jackson because of “insufficient evidence,” Chief Deputy Prosecutor Mary Robnett recently said. Fortson’s filings made no reference to the decision.

Fortson also included civil records showing Jackson and his girlfriend had delinquent tax judgments, and a state social worker’s report that opined Jackson had “played a large role in the trauma and chaos” surrounding his family.

“Mr. Jackson(’s) credibility would seem to have a few flaws in it,” Fortson wrote.

By late 2006 and into early 2007, Kelvin Jackson had filed several complaints to Fortson’s supervisor at the city’s Human Rights and Human Services Department. His e-mails complained that Fortson had lied to him, harassed him, given damaging advice to his children and abused her authority.

“I never got a single response,” he said.

At least some of the complaints were logged into the city’s complaint system, records show. Fortson responded to one in January 2007, writing to her boss that Jackson’s claims were lies. Kelvin Jackson was an abuser, Fortson wrote. It was her job to help protect his wife and kids.

And if Jackson continued to complain and “harass my supervisor,” she added, “I will be force(d) to get a anti-harassment order against him.”

VISIT TO FLORIDA

In June 2007, Pierce County Superior Court Judge Susan Serko decreed the Jacksons’ marriage invalid and issued a parenting plan. It called for daughter Quiymani to primarily live with her mom and gave liberal unsupervised visitation rights to her father. Both parents received equal authority in making major decisions.

Custody issues involving the son – who lived with his mom and hadn’t seen his father for seven months – were to be resolved later, pending counseling reports.

Notations in the final order signed by the judge also showed that Serko wasn’t convinced by Keisha Jackson’s domestic violence claims. Under the “Parental Conduct” and “Other Factors” sections of the plan’s form – areas that trigger restrictions on parental rights if domestic violence is found to exist – the order reads: “Does Not Apply.”

Less than two months later, Keisha Jackson returned to court, seeking permission to take her children to visit her cancer-stricken father in Florida. If allowed, the trip meant Quiymani would miss at least one scheduled visitation with her dad.

Kelvin Jackson argued against his ex-wife’s request.

“I don’t trust the fact that she’s going to go to Florida and come back,” he told Serko, according to hearing transcripts.

Jackson said he feared that once there, Keisha would file paperwork to make her three-week trip permanent.

Serko decided to allow the trip – with one condition.

“Keisha Jackson shall return to the state of Washington with the children no later than September 3rd, 2007,” she ordered.

But by Sept. 5, Keisha Jackson still hadn’t left Washington.

“The day we were supposed to leave, all the transmission fluid from my car conveniently disappeared,” Jackson recently said, implying her ex-husband was to blame.

Records show she did not contact the court to seek to modify the judge’s order. She did call Fortson for help.

Fortson paid $204 to put Keisha and her children up for two nights in a SeaTac hotel and paid $267 to rent a van for Jackson to drive to Florida, records show. She later claimed reimbursements from the city for “victim relocation.”

Both women have since claimed that Kelvin Jackson was making threats that were escalating, requiring Fortson to take action.

On Sept. 7 – four days after the judge’s deadline for returning – Keisha Jackson left in the van rented by Fortson. Joining her was her daughter, Quiymani, and a 14-year-old disabled niece in her care. The son and Keisha’s 17-year-old daughter from a previous marriage separately took a bus.

Jackson initially stopped in Mississippi, where she enrolled Quiymani in school, records show. Later, she took the children to Florida, where they stayed variously with their grandfather and a neighbor, records show.

By late January 2008, it was clear Keisha Jackson intended to make her stay permanent. She filed papers in a Florida court seeking child support, custody and a protection order against Kelvin Jackson.

THE BAILOUT

In March 2008, Blinn, the deputy prosecutor, obtained a warrant for Keisha Jackson and habeas corpus writs to return the Jackson children to Washington.

On March 28, 2008, after Keisha Jackson appeared in a Florida court for a protection order hearing, deputies arrested her for suspicion of felony custodial interference. She was extradited to Washington three weeks later, and booked into the Pierce County Jail.

Meantime, Kelvin Jackson still couldn’t find his children. “I knew they were in Florida,” he said, “but I didn’t know where.”

In fact, his son was living at his grandfather’s home while Quiymani lived with a neighbor.

“My mom didn’t want us to talk to our dad,” Quiymani recalled. “I was afraid to call.”

But with her mother jailed in April 2008, Quiymani finally asked the woman she lived with to call her dad.

“I missed him.”

Soon, the girl was on a flight bound for Sea-Tac Airport.

Blinn recalls speaking with Fortson on the phone shortly after Keisha Jackson’s arrest. Fortson seemed “irritated and unprofessional” when telling him that Kelvin Jackson had an extensive history of abuse against Keisha Jackson and others, Blinn said.

“I repeatedly reminded her it wasn’t my job to decide blame, but Ms. Jackson had violated a court order,” Blinn said he told her. “She didn’t seem satisfied with my explanation.”

Kelvin Jackson later informed Blinn that Fortson had bailed out his ex-wife. Blinn later raised the issue to Jacqueline Strong-Moss, one of Fortson’s supervisors.

“I told her I’m hearing rumors that China had posted her own funds for Ms. Jackson’s bail,” Blinn recalled. “And she said, ‘Oh no, It wasn’t her personal funds. It was (taxpayer) funds.’”

“My reaction was, ‘Oh, my gosh.’ And her’s was, ‘Well, yeah, this is not that uncommon.’”

Blinn sent a formal complaint to Tacoma’s city manager.

ETHICS INVESTIGATION

In late May 2008, the city assigned risk analyst Tracy Storwick to investigate.

Meanwhile, prosecutors considered charging Fortson with custodial interference for helping Keisha Jackson violate the court order. But after Jackson agreed to plead to a reduced contempt of court charge, they opted not to charge Fortson.

“There was something that potentially could have been charged,” said Brian Wasankari, a deputy prosecutor who reviewed the case. “But given that the person (who Fortson) helped had pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor instead of a felony, it didn’t seem just to charge (Fortson) with a felony.”

On Dec. 22, 2008, Storwick issued her findings to city officials, determining that evidence “strongly suggested” Fortson had abused her authority and misused city funds to benefit Jackson.

The investigation didn’t prove Fortson had used public money to bail out Jackson. Fortson claimed the money came from outside sources – a local consortium that helps victims. The investigator determined that the bail was paid from funds in a Tapco Credit Union account in Fortson’s name but couldn’t substantiate where the funds in the account came from.

But the investigation also found that Fortson previously had used taxpayer funds to bail out at least one jailed client. That case involved paying $175 for a woman taken into custody for driving with a suspended license, records show.

In her written response to the case last year, Fortson denied using city funds for Keisha Jackson’s bail, but acknowledged “several times in the past I have bailed out clients and was reimbursed by the City of Tacoma.”

Evidence also suggested that Fortson misspent public funds for her own “personal and private convenience,” the report said, including paying off $250 in traffic tickets and fines on her husband’s car. Fortson said the fines – mostly for parking tickets – were legitimate city expenses incurred while she was attending court hearings on official business.

The report also found that Fortson likely overstepped her authority by intervening in the Jacksons’ civil case because no “clear nexus to domestic violence” existed.

Still, Storwick could not prove Fortson had broken any ethics rules, in part because her supervisors, including Briehl and Strong-Moss, knew of or authorized her actions.

Storwick “strongly recommended” the city implement better oversight of Fortson’s position. She added that the ethics probe should be reopened if new information emerged.

In early 2009, the city manager’s office remanded the case for further investigation. About a month later, after Storwick re-interviewed Fortson, she issued a supplemental report.

It found Fortson had “knowingly misused her official city position and city funds” by aiding Keisha Jackson’s illegal trip to Florida.

Storwick noted that at times Fortson changed her story and “repeatedly offered conflicting rationales” when asked who had paid for Keisha Jackson’s hotel room and rental van. Fortson also gave Storwick the wrong documentation when asked to support claims that outside state funds had covered those expenses, the report said.

Based on the evidence, Storwick reasoned that Fortson either knowingly had helped Jackson make the trip, or she had misrepresented the reason for renting the van to obtain funds for unauthorized purposes. Either way, the report found that Fortson had violated the city’s ethics code.

FORTSON FIRES BACK

In March 2009, Fortson criticized both reports as “defective” in an 18-page response.

She denied ever being Keisha Jackson’s friend, said she hadn’t misused city funds, and disputed the finding that she’d violated any ethics rules.

Fortson also denied knowing details of the court order requiring Jackson’s return to Washington. Then, she blasted Blinn and Storwick for acting irresponsibly.

“Domestic violence is not always documented,” Fortson wrote. “It would seem incredulous to me that anyone who has been through the David Brame and John Mummhoud (sic) incident and/or the efforts made by the City of Tacoma to educate its employees regarding domestic violence would end up making such bold and ridiculous statements in any official report about ‘undocumented’ allegations of domestic violence.”

Downing, Fortson’s lawyer, added that his client’s actions were within the scope of her job and noted that no one from the city even interviewed Keisha Jackson.

“How can you investigate this without talking to one of the primary people involved?” he asked.

Keisha Jackson, 40, recently insisted her abuse claims are true.

“From what I understand, it was her job to work with me the way she did,” she said. “Haven’t you seen all the women out there who complain and complain about domestic violence, and no one ever does anything and they end up dead?”

‘TIRED OF FIGHTING’

Inside an airy rambler home on a quiet Lakewood street, Quiymani Jackson, now 13, slouched into a dark sofa and recalled a city advocate who, as a 9-year-old kid, she called “Ms. China.”

“Sometimes I thought of her as a friend, sometimes as just a (case)worker,” she said.

The woman made her a flower girl in her wedding, even once bought her a pet turtle.

“I liked her,” Quiymani said.

Mani, as she likes to be called, then described her life’s upheaval three years ago, when her mom packed her and a disabled cousin into a van and headed south. She missed a lot of school, she said. She talked to a lot of counselors. Her mom coached her on what to say, she said.

“I used to have nightmares with my mom,” she said. “I always woke up crying, in the fetal position.”

Mani Jackson said her life is much better now since she came to live here, with her father, his new wife and the wife’s son. Finally, she addressed a lingering question: “My dad doesn’t beat me.”

After a second trial in late 2008, Kelvin Jackson won custody of Mani and granted his ex-wife supervised visitation.

Jackson’s son, now 17, still lives with his mom. After losing contact with his son for two years, Kelvin Jackson chose not seek custody. He said he hopes to reconnect when his son turns 18.

Earlier this year, the City of Tacoma paid Jackson $29,000 to settle a $1 million claim he brought based on Fortson’s conduct. Jackson, who removes asbestos for a living, said he isn’t happy with the city’s settlement.

“I was just tired of fighting,” he said. “No amount of money is going to take away the pain of what we’ve gone through.”

→ No CommentsTags:

The Times Are Slowly Changing, …. In California

January 30th, 2012 · DV Industry, DV News

July 13th, 2010 · No Comments

Woman jailed for making threats … to herself

By LARRY WELBORN

THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER

July 12, 2010 12:00 p.m.

SANTA ANA – A 25-year-old Santa Ana woman was sentenced to a year in jail Friday for sending hundreds of threatening text messages – to herself.

Jeanne Mundango Manunga’s criminal problem was that she blamed the harassing text messages on an ex-boyfriend and his sister-in-law, and reported them to the police.

They were arrested on false charges of making criminal threats and required to post thousands of dollars in bail. The sister-in-law was arrested three times, and spent some time in custody before she could gather enough funds to pay the bail on her third arrest.

A jury convicted Manunga of three felony counts of false imprisonment by fraud or deceit and two misdemeanor counts of making a false police report in May.

On Friday, Superior Court Judge Patrick H. Donahue sentenced Manunga to a year in jail, placed her on three years probation, told her to stay away from her ex-boyfriend and his sister-in-law, and ordered her to repay the victims about $50,000 in restitution.

Deputy District Attorney Mena Guirguis said that after Manunga and her former boyfriend stopped dating in 2008, she took out a pre-paid cell phone in his sister-in-law’s name, and started sending the threatening text messages to her regular cell phone.

Manunga then went to three different police departments on at least 19 occasions and claimed that the ex-boyfriend and the sister-in-law were behind the threats.

Her scheme was uncovered when the victims went to the phone store, talked with the salesman and learned that Manunga had bought the pre-paid phone under the sister-in-law’s name, Guirguis said.

They reported that information to a Costa Mesa police detective, but by then a third arrest warrant had been issued for the sister-in-law.

During a follow-up investigation, the detective discovered that most of the threatening text messages were sent when the pre-paid cell phone was in close proximity to Manjunga’s home or work, Guirguis said.

At the sentencing hearing Friday, the two victims said they were devastated about being arrested on false charges, and worried about clearing their names.

Contact the writer: lwelborn@ocregister.com or 714-834-3784

→ No CommentsTags:

More Restraining Orders Gone Wild

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Industry

October 1st, 2009 · 5 Comments

On September 25, 2009, Robert Franklin, Esq., of Fathers & Families appeared on the Helen Glover Show to discuss the temporary restraining order entered against Olympic and professional wrestler Kurt Angle. The interview went well.  Ms. Glover was receptive to the idea that domestic violence restraining orders can be unjust in some circumstances. Mr. Franklin’s reactions are pasted below.

September 26th, 2009 by Robert Franklin, Esq.

I did an interview on the Helen Glover Show on WHJJ AM Radio 920 in Providence, Rhode Island on Friday, September 25th. The subject was the Kurt Angle case that I posted a piece about earlier. Listen to it here (WHJJ, 9/25/09).

As you recall, Angle is the heavyweight wrestler who won a gold medal for the United States at the Atlanta Games in 1996. He had a dating relationship with Trenesha Biggers for about 10 months. Eventually, she moved into his house, but the pair drifted apart emotionally. He allowed her to remain in his house, apparently because she had nowhere else to go and not much money.

Much to his surprise, she had a restraining order issued against him, without his presence in court. He was arrested for violating it less than two hours after it was issued, even though he had no knowledge of the order. He’s been exonerated on that charge.

But the major outrage is that the restraining order allows Biggers to live in Angle’s house and use his personal property for which she has apparently paid not one thin dime. Angle, by order of the court, can’t set foot on his own property. That’s been true for almost six weeks. There is to be a hearing on September 29th at which the judge will decide whether to make the temporary order permanent. It will be Angle’s first opportunity to tell his side of the story.

That was the topic of my appearance on Helen’s show. Aside from the obvious facts about restraining orders generally, another important aspect of them came up. Not only do restraining orders have the potential to violate parental rights and children’s rights to their parents, they also violate property rights. Angle’s case shows the potential for that kind of harm in no uncertain terms.

Angle’s girlfriend established her residency there solely by receiving her mail at Angle’s address. On that basis alone, he’s been removed from his own home, temporarily and maybe permanently. Angle’s case argues loudly that at the very least judges need to make inquiry into property ownership before tossing someone out on the street. If Biggers truly needed a restraining order, the judge could have prohibited him from coming near her, which, as far as I can tell from the interview Angle gave, would have been fine with him. That way, she would have been the one to vacate the house. He could have remained living there and she’d have been safe from whatever threat Angle posed, if any.

That was the thrust of my interview with Helen Glover. She was a cordial host, very open to the criticism of restraining orders that they can violate the restrained party’s property rights.

→ No CommentsTags:

Violence Against Women Act: Promotes Immigration Fraud, Costs Taxpayers $170 Million a Year

January 30th, 2012 · DV Industry

November 19th, 2008 · 23 Comments

Take a good hard long look at the eight reasons in which this act enables the circumvention of our constitutional liberties. They also apply to us and DEFINE what is wrong with the system as it stands and WHY it is sorely in need of repair.

Title VIII of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) addresses the needs of battered immigrants. The plight of abused immigrants should concern us all. But many persons are unaware how Title VIII of VAWA is widely used to allow, even encourage immigration fraud.

VAWA Facilitates Immigration Fraud in 8 Ways

1. Provides free legal services to persons who merely claim abuse.
2. Broadens the definition of “extreme cruelty”
3. Eliminates traditional standards of proof
4. Removes the “substantial connection” requirement
5. Bans all evidence by the alleged abuser, even if it shows fraud or illegal behavior
6. Educates persons on how to take advantage of these VAWA provisions
7. Overrides deportation hearings
8. Provides a loophole for persons in the midst of deportation

Perverse Incentives

 

VAWA affords generous services, benefits, and legal rights to immigrants who falsely allege abuse. It is estimated that these services cost the American taxpayer $170 million a year. (www.mediaradar.org/docs/RADARreport-VAWA-Funded-Immigration-Fraud.pdf)

VAWA Loopholes

Under VAWA, an immigrant can merely claim to be a victim of domestic violence without providing any hard proof of abuse. In most states, domestic violence is broadly defined to include being “afraid,” “fearful,” or even mental “distress.” Anyone can claim to be fearful, and few judges are willing to deny a person’s request for a restraining order.

The immigrant then takes the ex parte restraining order — issued without any hard evidence of abuse — and uses it to “prove” that he or she is a victim of domestic violence. That person is able to file a self-petition with the USCIS to remove the temporary conditions from the Green Card.

In addition, VAWA places the responsibility for adjudicating abuse petitions with a CIS office in rural Vermont, rather than with the local Service Centers that are in the best position to investigate the abuse claims and hear both sides of the story.

The Accused has No Standing to Refute the Allegation

Under VAWA, a person merely accused of abuse is classified as a “prohibited source,” and the alleged abuser often is never informed of the allegations. If the alleged abuser does learn of the charges, VAWA forbids the USCIS from accepting evidence to refute the allegations.

That person does not even have the right to present proof to CIS officials that the immigrant entered the country illegally!

Open Disregard of Due Process Doesn’t Help Victims

The most fundamental principle of the American criminal justice system is the accused must be given the opportunity to refute an allegation of wrongdoing. But under VAWA immigration provisions, an American citizen accused of partner abuse has no legal standing to refute the claim of the immigrant spouse with the US government. In fact, the accused may not have even been informed of the allegation!

Safeguards need to be added so true abuse victims are protected without taking away the rights of an alleged abuser. Due process includes providing every American citizen the opportunity to refute a false allegation.

Widespread false claims of abuse are taking away resources from true victims. The Violence Against Women Act is in dire need of reform.

Real Life Example of VAWA Based Immigration Fraud

Elena came to the US in November 2005 from Russia on a fiancé visa. Shortly afterwards, she married her American fiancé, David. David believed he had a happy marriage and a loving wife. Elena received her Conditional Green Card in August 2005, and the marriage began to deteriorate. Elena began to complain about anything and everything. She began to sleep in her daughter’s bedroom. At times, it seemed as though Elena was trying to provoke David into a physical confrontation. After fifteen months of marriage, David decided he could not continue living that way. Since Elena had often said she wanted to go back home to Russia, David suggested that maybe it was time. Elena was outraged, and told David he would be sorry. The next day, David was served with a domestic protection order. Elena accused him of beating her, stalking her, and threatening to kill her. David was evicted from his home for the next 9 days. In court, the judge dismissed the DPO due to insufficient evidence. Fifteen months later, David was back in court for the divorce. Once again, Elena made the same allegations of abuse. Elena was unable to produce any evidence of abuse. She had no record of 911 calls, no police reports, no emergency room visits, no unexplained injuries, no witness testimony attesting to abuse, or any other evidence of abuse. Once again, the judge dismissed all allegations of abuse. The divorce was granted to David based on mutual and voluntary separation. Prior to the divorce, Elena filed an I-360 Self Petition with the USCIS. Despite being unable to produce any evidence of abuse, Elena received her Permanent Green Card. David was never contacted by the USCIS for his side of the story, and he was ignored when he reached out to them. Elena not only received her Green Card, but she received free legal assistance for the divorce, she received free legal assistance for filing the I-360, she received assistance and subsidies from the local woman’s shelter, and she received court ordered alimony. David will be paying the $55,000 financial havoc that the false allegations of abuse cost him for years to come.

Voice of American Immigration Fraud Victims

Voice of American Immigration Fraud Victims is group of American men and women who have been victimized by foreign spouses who have use of false allegations of abuse to circumvent the American immigration system. We are in favor of stopping domestic violence, and we are in favor of legal immigration. In fact, some of are members ARE immigrants.

Our purpose is to inform lawmakers how VAWA is used to deny an American man or woman his or her most fundamental due process protections when an allegation of abuse is made.

For more information, visit: www.immigrationfraudvictims.com .

→ No CommentsTags:

Judge Communications

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts, King County Superior Court

Judge Communications

> Judge Linde,

>

> This is an error in the form used by the State Prosecutor who was

> scheduled on 1-07 Seattle jail calendar, on a City of Kenmore case.

> I can contact the State Prosecutor’s office and ask them to  submit

> the

> NCO on the correct District Court form or, wait until the next hearing

> on 2-17 where the City of Kenmore Prosecutor will be present and can

> readdress the NCO.

>

> Thank you.

> Rochelle

>

> _____________________________________________

> From: Linde, Barbara

> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM

> To: McKenzie, Rochelle

> Cc: Crozier, Tricia

> Subject: FW: Protection Order Issue

>

>

> Rochelle-

> Can you help us look into this problem order attached below?  also

> please send me the docket.

>

> _____________________________________________

> From: Pompeo, Kathryn

> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:25 AM

> To: Linde, Barbara

> Subject: FW: Protection Order Issue

>

>

>

> Judge Linde and Bathum;

>

> Here is a classic issue on the enforceability of a protection order

> that

> was discussed in the Domestic Violence Initiative meeting on Tuesday,

> Jan 26 and the issue of being on the wrong form that was discussed in

> the December 2009 Protection Order Summit.

>

> We received this order from the City of Kenmore via Shoreline District

> Court today in the Data Control Unit (notice the date of the order.)

>

>   <<Suchy Protection Order 010710.pdf>>

> The form that the order was prepared on is a Superior Court Order form

> from 4/2001.  When this was pointed out to the City of Kenmore

> Prosecutor by both the KCSO Detective at the time it was issued as

> well

> as by my DV Desk Data Technician this morning both received the same

> response. “That’s the only form we have.”  My Data Technician asked if

> they had access to the internet and when he received an affirmative he

> directed them to the pattern forms website for future orders and

> requested a corrected order as soon as possible.

>

> The other issues with this pre-trial order are the terms of what

> constitutes no contact; there are no limits on the distance that the

> respondent must stay away from the protected parties, nor does it

> prohibit stalking or harassing as the current orders do.  There is no

> reference to the current RCW’s and it was issued out of a district

> court

> even though it’s on a Superior Court Form.  Nor is there any LEIS or

> other information on the respondent. (My Data Tech and I have spent

> about an hour working on this one so far to get it entered and to

> try to

> get corrected information.)

>

> I can just imagine the respondent sitting in a car in front of the

> petitioner’s house claiming she’s not contacting the person so it’s

> not

> a violation of the order or the respondent following the petitioner

> in a

> vehicle with another car in between so that again the respondent can

> claim three was no contact.  This makes it very difficult for law

> enforcement to try to enforce the order.

>

> I’m also not sure of the legality of an order being issued from one

> court with the other court’s information on it.  Luckily, my DV Desk

> Data Technician recognized the case number as belonging to a city

> court

> and checked District Court Records first.

>

>

> Kathryn Pompeo

> Supervisor-Data Control Unit

> King County Sheriff’s Office

> Office:  (206) 296-7588

> Cell:    (206)255-4954

> Fax: (206) 296-0160

> MS: KCC-SO-0100

_____________________________________________

From:       Bathum, Richard

Sent:      Thursday, January 28, 2010 12:49 PM

To:      Martin, David

Subject:      RE: DV Court Study

I would be honored!  And yes, we tightened up the time frame considerably.  I am pleased with how the system is working right now.  That was a fun meeting this morning.

_____________________________________________

From: Martin, David

Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:55 AM

To: Bathum, Richard

Subject: DV Court Study

Judge Bathum,

It was great to hear your comments this morning about DV court.  It is amazing how efficiently the court is operating (did you really say 45 days to disposition?)  I was wondering if you had a few minutes to sit down and talk about the DV Court study with Jim and I.

Sincerely,

David Martin

________________________________________________________________________

David D. Martin | Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney

Chair | Domestic Violence Unit | King County Prosecuting Attorney

W554 King County Courthouse | 516 Third Avenue |Seattle, WA  98104

Work:  (206) 296-9503 | Cell: (206) 898-9416  | Fax: (206) 205-6104

email: david.martin@kingcounty.gov

→ No CommentsTags:

A Thurston County Nightmare

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Family

A Thurston County Nightmare

January 21st, 2009 · 30 Comments

By any account, Jeremy Kanoa Hughes is a good man. He has befriended police officers in Hawaii, applied for enlistment in the army and has tried to gain custody of his child. His only mistake is that he called his ex-wife a “dirty whore” one night after he caught her cheating on him in bed. I can’t imagine what that was like, but for that, he received an assault charge in the state of Hawaii.

He was making good money working hard in the entertainment industry, which took long hours. Because of this, he handed over the bill paying duties to his ex-wife, which was a fatal error. For providing for his family and working long honest hard hours of work, his reward was a cheating wife who spent all of his money, and that assault 3rd petty misdemeanor in Hawaii.

But, that wasn’t enough to satisfy this scorned woman. She filed bogus charge after bogus charge against him, contending that he was continuously breaking a no-contact order that she had filed to gain the upper hand in their child custody battle. Women are often coached to do this to keep the man at bay for whatever reasons they deem necessary.

Finally, one day, she messed up. She fraudulently charged that he was again breaking the no-contact order. The problem was that he was with his friend, a police officer at that time. Hawaii had seen enough of her. From that point forward, even though they did not file perjury charges, the police were ordered to ignore her cries of wolf

So what did this poor woman do? Why, she moved to Thurston County, of course! Thurston County is renowned for its gender-biased policies and coddles the likes of her with forces like Judge Paula Casey.


It was a knockout blow to Jeremy. Game. Set. Match. He had no idea what was coming next. But the likes of Bruce Fischer and Joe Antole knew full well what was in store.

She took his child as well. Jeremy, in turn, filed for custody in the state of Hawaii, in the form of a subpoena so that he could at the least arrange to have visitation. The day before that hearing, She, in turn, filed a restraining order based on hearsay that Jeremy had caused her emotional distress and that he was “threatening” to remove the child from the state. Never mind the bogus charges and the history in Hawaii. She now had the full support of the prosecutor, Jennifer Weiler. As of today, Jennifer has not responded to my inquiries regarding not only Jeremy, but Bruce Fischer and Joe Antole as well.

Editor’s note. Jennifer did respond and denied even knowing first hand of this case, something which I find to be astounding based upon what happened. She informed me that she issues warrants based upon investigations. The “investigation” in this case was a phone call to verify that he had spoken with his child. That was it. Never mind that this occurred before any warrant was served. Never mind that the order in WA recognizes Hawaii’s judgments.  She “insists” that these investigations are thorough, even though evidence in this and many other cases suggest otherwise.

Nobody in Thurston County seemed to care that he had initially and honestly had issued a subpoena for her appearance to resolve the custody of his son. He had never threatened her in any way at all. But all it takes is for somebody to file a false claim and have that brought before a judge, which is exactly what she did. Her actions in Hawaii were ignored in this process. What happened next was beyond bizarre and goes to the heart of how Thurston County operates.

Early in August of 2007, a detective called Jeremy from Thurston county. He asked if he had called his son at 7PM a few days earlier, He answered yes and that he had a court order allowing him to do that The detective said thanks and that was it. He never once implied that Jeremy was being investigated for doing anything illegal or that there were any orders from Washington. In fact, he was and there were orders.

Several months later, Jeremy went to re-enlist in the military. What happened next floored him. He had an arrest warrant issued for violating a TRO when he called his son that day. Even though the restraining order was dated August 8th, 2007 and had a Hawaii court order that said he was allowed to call at 7PM, AND a Washington order stating Hawaii had precedence, Thurston County decided otherwise. He was turned down by the military until he cleared this up.

So, Jeremy called Thurston County and ran into nothing but resistance regarding this matter. He did not know that they were playing, judge, jury and executioner with him. Any normal man trying to do the right thing for his child would not see this coming. They would not give him a case number or anything, instead insisting that he show up in person. He recorded this conversation and informed them he would appear in person and see a judge regarding this matter. He was also told that he would not be arrested as it was just a investigation.

He was being set up.

So, he went to set a court date and was told to go across the hall to the sheriffs office. They took his name, handcuffed him and took him directly to the county jail, where he was finger printed, stripped, given a jump suit, and tossed into a cell with 15 convicted criminals. He was also told I had no rights to anything because I had a NO BAIL warrant and would not be released until his court date in March. They never read him his rights or stated I was under arrest, When I asked if he was under arrest they stated “no, it was an “Investigative Detention”. After he was in custody for longer than 2 days, he inquired as to why this was being done. They said because it was a violent offense and were “allowed” to hold him for up to 6 months.

This is how Thurston County treats men who legally contact their families.

It also begs the question as to who is creating and setting these illegal policies as it is illegal to hold someone for longer than two days without arresting them. Divine intervention coming from somebody powerful put an end to this part of this mess.

He was then “allowed” to go home to Oregon, but had to come back for a court date, which is all he wanted in the first place.

Jeremy is still without his son. He has no idea where he is as his ex-wife has again relocated without notifying either him or the court as to her whereabouts. She has yet to respond to the subpoena in Hawaii, and is most likely working with Thurston County on her next move.

Because the original judge in Hawaii didn’t fully trust her, he was able to obtain independent access to reports regarding his son’s doctors and teachers His son used to tell the therapist that he loved him, missed him and didn’t want to live with her. Nowadays, after all of the abuse she has heaped on him, his son’s story has reversed as she has successfully alienated him. Jeremy has noticed from these reports and what brief experiences he has with him, that his son no longer fits in and has been labeled everything from autistic to having learning disability.

Men’s rights are often trampled in these courts and especially in Thurston County. We have a good man here, who cannot obtain decent employment as he now has a “record” for legally calling his son. He cannot re-enlist in the military until this is cleaned up. And he has not seen his son in over a year and a half.

If not for the divine intervention, he would still be in jail. Bogus restraining orders are often used to arrest and detain men there. Men lose their jobs and, fall behind on child support, facing legal action or arrest by falling into RO DV traps like this.

Men of Thurston County, beware. This is how they roll.

→ No CommentsTags:

Judge Paula Casey – The Shame of Thurston County

January 30th, 2012 · DV Courts

July 18th, 2008 · 7 Comments

Homeowner Stripped of Property and Home by Thurston County Judge

Press Release; July 16, 2008.
Olympia, WA

Recently, the Thurston County family court weathered a scandal related to the display of a series of inappropriate and allegedly gender biased pictures. The story was brought to you back in March on King 5 News and in the Olympian Newspaper. The “art” was removed after numerous complaints alleging an appearance of bias and potential prejudice towards men and fathers. The County Clerk’s office also removed gender biased content from their web site at the same time. Now, the judge in that story (Judge Paula Casey) is being sued by the man in the story for barring him from his home, for refusing him his lawful personal property and for leaving an abandoned property. His complaint asserts that Judge Casey is knowingly and purposely driving the home into foreclosure out of spite and to compensate local law firm her attorney fee award that is under appeal. Judge Casey was made aware the former wife had defaulted on the mortgage and abandoned the property. The man asserts the judge and the county both willfully and knowingly refused him access to the courts and a legal remedy. The man, Bruce Fischer, filed a civil law suit for damages and relief for this family court judge’s apparent punitive and retaliatory actions in effort to save his home from foreclosure and to avert unnecessary financial loss.

Read more about how the system and Judge Casey failed…..

The restraining order is not an uncommon tool in the divorce attorney’s arsenal and is very common in Thurston County Divorce court especially by women represented by Connolly, Tacon and Meserve Law Firm, the law firm representing the former wife, Karen Fischer. However, a restraining order has a purpose – Protection, if only from contrived alleged injury or fear. Nonetheless, the one issued in the Fischer case no longer serves the purpose of restraining a party from the other’s home, since the home was abandoned. Judge Casey made clear her disinterest in restoring the property awarded to Mr. Fischer and, instead, is allowing the property to be placed in jeopardy. Too, there is the known fact that Mr. Fischer is liable for the mortgage and the financial fallout. Mr. Fischer submits it to be not unreasonable to conclude the damage he is suffering out of the abuses of authority are related to his efforts to champion fathers’ rights and fairness that have been a high profile thorn in Casey’s side.

It is clear from the record that Judge Casey is intentionally barring him access to his property and home and was repeatedly made aware that his ex wife was in default before abandoning the property. “This judge lost her ability to be reasonable and fair long ago” and is now acting vindictively in an apparent pay back for Mr. Fischer bringing forth the biased artwork story to the public and for standing up for his legal rights against her unfounded rulings. “It is pretty obvious to all involved that this judge is trying to show me who is boss “, said Mr. Fischer.

“She failed to perform her proscribed duties as an officer of the court, which she took an oath to perform.” Judge Casey had an obligation to make final determinations of property and insure the community assets in her charge were not wasted. Judge Casey also failed to restore Mr. Fischer’s position based on the Public Duty Doctrine. The Public Duty Doctrine, or fireman’s clause, imposes liabilities on government entities, when they take charge of an individual or their property. “I am unsure if my house were to burn down today that it would even be covered.” “It would be a huge loss for the mortgage company and me.” The county recently lost a multi million dollar law suit due to a gender bias suit that was filed against Ed Holm and the prosecuting attorney’s office. Mr. Fischer has not declared his damages amount yet. He is waiting to see if the situation on his house is going to be rectified before naming final damages against his ex-wife, Judge Casey and Thurston County for the unnecessary and orchestrated financial harm and potential foreclosure of his home.

The Division II Appellate Court declined to intervene, last week, stating it is the job of the Supreme Court of Washington to tell a Superior Court Judge to follow the law and perform her sworn duties. The county’s only response to date has been that “they should be dismissed” from the lawsuit. No other help or actions were taken by the county officials to help this citizen who is being trampled by this judge. The County Board of Commissioners were also made aware of the situation. They made no attempt to help or respond. The county initially dismissed all of their judges and assigned a judge from a neighboring county after a critical time delay. Thurston County also refused to provide a copy of any document regarding the recusal of all Thurston Judges. Though several individuals have copies of the web page, the document apparently no longer exists and has been removed from the Thurston court index. Tampering with public records is a crime in the State of Washington.

Mr. Fischer’s Law Suit can be found under Thurston Superior Court Cause #08-2-01330-5. Ed Holm’s Prosecuting Attorney’s office is defending the county and Judge Paula Casey on public time and expense. Ed Holm is a former partner in the Connolly, Tacon and Meserve Law Firm. Judge Paula Casey’s counterpart at the Family court, Judge Thomas McPhee, is also a former partner in the Connolly, Tacon and Meserve Law Firm.

Mr. Fischer has not seen his beloved children since last year. The home is set to be auctioned for sale on August 15th.

→ No CommentsTags:

Case Building Against Doug Bartholomew – Get In On The Action

January 30th, 2012 · Doug Bartholomew and Associates, DV Industry

June 13th, 2009 · 10 Comments

I have had many responses to my call out for those having difficulties with self-proclaimed, and narcissistic actor, Doug Bartholomew. He’s very careful with his language these days, having referred to me (he claims indirectly) as being a stalker and a repeat DV offender, which I’m not. He has also claimed that the day in which he called me, somebody created another ID on his computer as his reason for concern. I simply pointed out that local computer logs and IP tracking could easily discover who that was, albeit himself who “created” this or somebody else, or maybe this is a fabrication altogether. Either way, he stumbled when offering specifics and could not relate this problem to me (or anyone) being a stalker and/or repeat DV offender.

At one point he mentioned that one party was not going to like his findings, which backs up my claims of quackery and hackery against this man and his “practice”. That reveals that he doesn’t think it’s possible for two to be responsible for an altercation. That’s funny because that age-old saying that is wise beyond its years, doesn’t state: “It only takes one to fight”. I’d like for him to explain that one further.

As for stalking, he has now returned two of my messages as I have NOT repeatedly called his office, which is what a real stalker would do. So, please keep up these actions and  keep up the big mouth in your classes Doug, as it’s helpful to everyone!

Currently, we are working with well over 5 complaints against this man, which includes tapes of his sessions and the biased line of questioning that he uses under the “guise” of being an expert showing that he enables the continues the bad behavior of others as “victims”, while looking for anything that he can use against those not labeled as victims, then charges  ridiculous charges for these practices.

If one, in turn asks him to do further ivestigation, as does often happen because of the biased line of questioning that he uses in the first place he simply threatens them with more exhorbitant charges for what really should have happened in the first place.

As a result, we also have members of his staff involved as they are concerned about what is happening. Complaints are soon to be filed with the Department of Health as this man ans his practices need to be stopped. There is verry little, if anything, that is CLINICALLY involved here.

Stay tuned for developments.

→ No CommentsTags:

Washington DV Press Mourns the Passing of Advocate John Lukas

January 26th, 2012 · DV Industry

January 25th, 2012 marks the passing of one of the men who fought so hard for recognition of the abuse happening at the hands of those tasked with stopping abuse. This man named John Lukas did not pass away (he is alive and relocated to the mid west) he simply went the way of so many fathers rights advocates he discovered this fight for justice was more than he could tackle, he made a good effort for a number of years however, no question he will be remembered and talked about for a long time.

Mr. Lukas came into trouble several years ago resulting out of a abusive conflict with his ex wife and his trials and tribulations with the King County justice system and the ever abusive DV Treatment. He attended several DVPT programs and his aggressive style for holding others accountable quickly gave him a reputation here in Washington State. He entered into the system needing help, the system provided him none and to the contrary society was left with a broken man who fought to recover but could not overcome.

He called for change at several Washington State Agencies, DOH and DSHS to name a couple, was critical of many public employees Roy Carson, Maureen Kelly, Michael Gleason, private employees like Barry Glatt and Doug Bartholomew. He made a impression at a King County DVPT Gold Standard Committee meeting. John fought hard for what he felt was unjust and corrupt behavior whenever he could.

At the end he simply had become so bitter and concious of the corruption he could no longer carry on. It is a story fathers rights groups have seen again and again over the years the odds are stacked against any man (or woman) who stands up against injustice. The system is constructed to ruin a person from the inside out. No more evident is this than the family court arena where within 15 minutes a fathers entire life will be turned upside down and their most prized possessions are taken away, the children (John had the advantage of not suffering the void created by the loss of your children because he has no children).

At various points in his life he was happier and had overcome great personal loss, but now he finds solace in his cats, his cooking and the chilly winters of Green Bay, the system has no concern for men like John Lukas and I am sure many King County Professionals will revel in the news reported here I feel sorry for those who lack the ability not to help their fellow man, John certainly rubbed many people wrong (all the way to the end in fact) but I can say he was once my friend when I needed one and I know many can say the same thing.

John never quite made the system change the way he so dearly wanted, but he did make one hell of a dent in it. His hard work and sacrifice will make the road a little smoother for the next guy.

2012 marks the passing of yet one more who tried and failed to overcome the beast our government has become, one more man who the system could not stop kicking when he was down. I am sure somewhere out there is still one or two PDR’s waiting to be completed for him.

I wish you well John Lukas.

→ 1 CommentTags:

Dale and Cindi Todd of Phoenix Counseling Service

January 25th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Industry, DV News

Original Story from November 2009

Cindi and Dale Todd run Phoenix Counseling Services, Inc. up in Everett, WA. They are the latest in the long line of pretenders that we are out to expose in the corrupt DV Industry within the State of Washington. Dale boasts on his website that he is a Certified Clinical Criminal Justice Specialist through the National Association of Forensic Therapists and The American College of Certified Counselors. He holds an advanced (Ph.D.) Doctorate Degree in Business Administration with a specialization in Criminal Justice, a (M.P.A.) Masters Degree in Public Administration in Criminal Justice and a (B.A.S.) Bachelors Degree in Psychology and (A.A.S.) Police Science. Curiously, he does not state where that last accreditation came from.

The problem is that ALL of his accreditations are from online  “Universities”. But what if the certificates on the wall could be had by anybody, even a cat? How would you feel then? I don’t know about you, but if I went to a doctor for a physical or mental problem, I would like to have the highest level of service from said doctor. If I found out that they had online credentials, I would definitely seek help elsewhere. And I strongly suggest you do as well.

In fact, the last time Dale Todd set foot on a university campus was back in 1976, according to testimony last week involving a woman who pulled the rape card, during a court ordered domestic violence class after assaulting her boyfriend. This “class” was with Dale Todd. Dale Todd, phony credentials and all “determined” after three sessions with this woman, that she was raped, using “role playing” in his “diagnosis.

Keep in mind that this was a simple child custody case. Rape charges were never filed There was never any police report. It was just Dale Todd’s enabling of bad behavior that set in motion one of the most bizarre court cases seen in years. In fact, pictures of the assault of this man were shown in this courtroom. This picture showed him with a bloody lip and black eye from the initial assault by the woman that started this bizarre case in motion with Dale Todd’s enabling of her false rape claims. The WSCADV (Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence)  also sent an “expert” witness. This witness  could not utter the words “domestic violence” when asked by the petitioners’ lawyer to describe the action that resulted in that picture. Instead, she stated that it was an action from “a woman behaving badly”.

As it turned out, the male petitioner had pictures of himself and his girlfriend at a party, shopping receipts and phone records from the very weekend in which the alleged “repeated raping” had “occurred”.

So, this PHD was now in a position of having to justify how one could throw a party at their house, rape his girlfriend, take her shopping, rape her, let her get on the phone and rape her again. And both she and Dale both acknowledged that there was no police report filed. Instead, he used “syndromes” to describe her behavior while she insisted what she said was true., without any remorse whatsoever. Now, reverse the genders in this case and imagine Dale stepping up for men in the same way. DV counselors have been fired for doing so, even when there was more than probable cause to back up their testimony. Instead, enabling of false rape claims that get thrown out of court somehow have more value in these courts, than a counselor telling the truth about a DV situation.

Sound far-fetched? I agree!

So bizarre was his testimony that it prompted the petitioner’s attorney to do a background check on Dale Todd, where the court learned of all of his online credentials. This is what you get when you get one of the pretenders in the DV industry in Washington State. Even my cat could have attained a certification from these sites.

Worse yet, this man has a close relationship with Doug Bartholomew, as Doug relies Dale Todd for testimony, support, and advice. You get the picture. Both of these men also serve as DV advisors within the state DV committees. Both helped to compose the DV state statutes for the DSHS (Dept. of Social and Human Services), even though Doug has claimed to have written them all by his lonesome on many occasions. This is the type of personal bias that drives the DV Industry within Washington State.

Needless to say, the rape allegations were thrown out, and the man was not convicted of anything. BOTH parents were ordered into anger management followed by respectful parenting classes. That follows my common sense assertions that it takes two.  The woman will have to restart her “treatment” after this folly, but walked away Scott free from making these false allegations, accusations and statements.

And so did Dale Todd for enabling that type of behavior. Despite the picture, and police reports, this “PHD” saw fit to enable the woman as the “victim” and the man as the aggressor. Bartholomew also chipped in his two cents by attempting to butcher this man on the stand as well. Thankfully, he had his sessions with Mr. Bartholomew recorded that revealed that Bartholomew’s “expert” line of questioning was nothing more than a setup. Don Dutton was the man’s expert witness. Unlike the pretenders, Mr. Dutton has over 27 pages worth of credentials, none of which involved online “universities”. He seriously questioned Mr. Batholomew’s line of questioning and how he wound up with the bizarre conclusions that he did, despite the fact that he was the victim in this case and had the proof in the form of pictures, phone records and shopping receipts to prove it.

The cost of this defense? It cost the accused man well over $100,000 to defend himself in court in a simple child custody case. This is what I mean when I say that this industry is all about the money. This is what happens when you get pretenders like Dale Todd and Doug Bartholomew as primary driving forces behind the Washington State Domestic Violence movement. They have answers to explain every one of their actions, backed up by their loosely defined statutes, which creates an allowance for an extremely biased treatment program with wide latitude to do as they please. They’ve made millions from this gravy train. Meanwhile, poor men like this have to spend a ton of money to defend themselves from the obvious.

This is what false accusations do to men. On top of that, some even lose cases like this despite the fact that many have a good solid defense. The utter impunity, ugly and vindictive nature of these courts and organizations like the Northwest Women’s Law Center, headed up by gender feminist Pat Novotny are what men are up against. They drain the man financially and mentally, while he has no support or advocacy at all. After they lose, they simply give up and lose faith in the system, while their life has been ruined and they have no more recourse other than to “take it like a man”.

Domestic Violence “science” leaves much to be desired, as DV “experts” have discovered the artful form of wording, which must be listened to closely. Almost all of the DV “experts” answers and explanations, much like that of Evan Stark, have caveats and fine print attached to it. For instance, the statement of “Domestic Violence is the leading cause of injury to women between the ages of 15-54″, has been repeated so often it is now their truth. That came from Evan Stark. The caveat? Mr. Stark claimed to me in an e-mail exchange that this figure is “from women who seek medical attention”, When pushed further, he stated that it also had the caveat of those “who sought medical attention who walked into the emergency room at the hospital”. I didn’t even believe that as he could only verify that with data from one county in Connecticut. Yet, that blatant statement graces many pages of DV shelters and organizations throughout the country.

Pretenders like Dale Todd and Doug Bartholomew fully ascribe to this type of “science”. Such are the “truths” and statistics of the DV Industry.

Meanwhile, this story took a stranger turn this week as three people in Cindi Todd’s (Dale Todd’s wife) DV class reported to me that Ms. Todd spent a good portion of her class describing that rape/child custody trial as if they had accomplished some good. In fact, she claimed Mr. Dutton had perjured himself on the stand. When I called her regarding this, she denied it. I asked her “Why would multiple sources report the very same statement to me”? She had no answer. When I asked about her husband’s PHD, she beat around the bush until I asked her where he went to school to obtain that “PHD” and the other paper credentials. It was then that she admitted to me that they were online paper documents obtained from online paper mills.

This brings forth the following question. What business does a treatment center “provider” have in discussing ongoing litigation as actual treatment during an actual treatment session? This is what is happening should you be treated at Phoenix Counseling Services and most DV treatment centers in Washington State. That’s how they treat and view “accountability”. They have none while you have to display yours in a dysfunctional manner for over a year, or until they “decide” to pass you. If you don’t, they will use threats and coercion in the form of threatening you with your child visitation rights. That’s right. In DIRECT conflict with their teachings, they use the same behaviors that they hold you accountable for. The “Enforcer”, Doug Bartholomew, is behind these “techniques”

As you can see, I call this treatment and don’t dare use the word therapy, as there is a difference. These treatment centers cannot legally call this therapy without the proper credentials. Therapy can only be obtained from a licensed psychologist. Treatment is provided by state certified agencies that require only 50 hours of training before they can “treat”. Along with this comes ongoing yearly training and indoctrination into these corrupt practices at local DV shelters that work in close conjunction with the likes of WSCADV, Mr. Bartholomew, and Mr. Todd, They often use threats and coercion to run these treatment centers and intimidate men with losing their children, families, money, and much, much more, should they not “comply”. This is in direct violation of their teachings, but strangely, there are no statutes to define this behavior.

It could be challenged. It will be challenged. But it will cost a small fortune and these men know that. Until then, they will continue to operate, unabated, until a higher authority steps in to clean this up.  Many actions are in the works, including the FBI, who has acknowledged that this has become a problem, as this is a circumvention of due process.

Mr. Bartholomew is now under review by the Department of Health. Barry Glatt is now out of the Industry and is now working as a quit smoking counselor at Free and Clear in Seattle. Mr. Glatt’s review at the DOH has moved forward to their legal department.  Roy Carson, head of the DSHS DVPT programs, was “laid off” with cause, this past May.

→ No CommentsTags:

Mainstream Seattle Media Calls Attention to Gender Bias In Superior Court

January 25th, 2012 · DV Courts, DV Family, DV Industry, DV News, King County Superior Court

Seattle Weekly has just published a shocking (well not for us but for “Normal Media”) series of stories about the shameful abuses happening everyday in King County Superior courtrooms, simply that Civil Domestic Violence Protection Orders are being used in some cases as a weapon against fathers to gain the upper hand in custody and divorce proceedings with the support of Commissioners and Judges.

Autor Nina Shapiro really did a good job on this story, holds no punches back she named names and got interviews (I am sure she will not be getting anymore from KCSC after this). She went all in and I am sure pissed off many of the DV Industry power players here in Seattle.

Lots of the DV Industry worst abusers were named: KCSC Chief Commissioner Leonid “Les” Ponomarchuk, Commissioner Meg Sassaman, Commissioner Jacqueline Jeske, Commissioner Lori K. Smith, 2011 Assistant Presiding Chief Judge James Doerty, Lawyer Jan Dyer to name a few.

Great Series of stories which I am looking forward to more from Ms. Shapiro.

http://www.seattleweekly.com/2012-01-18/news/ripped-apart/

http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2012/01/family_court_dads_regularly_lo.php

http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2012/01/sky_metalwalas_dad_is_victim_o.php

 

Great stories and some quality comments. 

 

→ No CommentsTags:

Gender Biased DV Policy – King County Washington

January 25th, 2012 · DV Courts, King County Superior Court

Working with Survivors Charged with DV-Related Crimes:
Some Information for Advocates

From the King County Coalition Against Domestic Violence, October, 20031

The King County criminal legal system is complex and can be overwhelming to people who are defendants or victims in criminal cases, especially those who are domestic violence survivors. The information below describes the various stages in the criminal court process and highlights some opportunities for advocacy with survivors who have been charged with DV-related crimes.

Police Agencies, Jails, Courts and More Courts: In the King County region there are 26 independent cities, most of which have their own police agencies and courts2. When a person is arrested for a misdemeanor crime, their case is processed either in the local municipal court, or in one of the King County District Courts, depending on where it occurred. When a person is arrested for a felony crime, their case is processed in by the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, and heard by judge in King County Superior Court.

Criminal Cases: There are several stages to a criminal case, which are explained in more detail below. Key stages are:

arraignment, when charges are officially filed, Pretrial” or “case scheduling” hearings, depending on the court system, Trial: if a trial results in conviction, then the case proceeds to Sentencing.

Steps in the Court Process

Initial investigation: The initial investigation of the crime is conducted by one or more patrol officers who travel to the crime scene or to the location of the victim, shortly after the crime is reported. Officers interview the parties and any witnesses, and begin an initial report listing the circumstances of the crime. The officer may also take photographs, and collect any related evidence.

According to Washington State Law, (RCW 10.31.100)

When the officer has probable cause to believe that family or household members have assaulted each other, the officer is not required to arrest both persons. The officer shall arrest the person whom the officer believes to be the primary physical aggressor. In making this determination, the officer shall make every reasonable effort to consider: (i) The intent to protect victims of domestic violence under RCW 10.99.010; (ii) the comparative extent of injuries inflicted or serious threats creating fear of physical injury; and (iii) the history of domestic violence between the persons involved.

1 Funded by the Domestic and Sexual Violence Prevention Office, Human Services Department, City of Seattle, through VAWO, Arrest Programs Grant, 98-WE-VX-00282 A list of courts in King County is available on the Internet at www.courts.wa.gov, under Court Directory.

If the person was acting in self-defense, it may be beneficial to tell the officer why and how she was defending herself. If she has been physically or sexually abused or threatened by her partner, she may wish to tell the officer as much information as possible about this history. As described in the RCW above, officers are required to consider the history of domestic violence between the parties. [Read more →]

→ No CommentsTags:

DSHS Sanctioned Doug Bartholomew for Release of Records

January 25th, 2012 · Doug Bartholomew and Associates

This is a repost of a article originally posted on June 11th, 2010

This past week, one of many complaints lodged against Doug Bartholomew came to a close. Despite the loose statutes and past history of selective enforcement of these minimum standards of WAC 388-60, The DSHS found Mr. Bartholomew behaved in a manner that placed DV victims  at risk. The evidence revealed that Doug Bartholomew had been releasing victim information to participants in his class. WADVPress has obtained further proof that this is not a random act, and in fact has been going on for years. Forthcoming complaints will be issued by those many who have been coming forward through this website.

These complaints will also include not only further allegations, but substantiated proof of identical activities, as well as other violations.

Despite being found at fault for placing victims at risk, the DSHS only saw fit to enforce a written warning which included the weak requirement that Mr. Bartholomew must only submit a plan for ensuring that all information provided by, or about, DV victims be kept confidential.

In other words, he must live up to the WAC standards that he had previously bragged about creating in the past. Nowhere is the sanction does it mention that Bartholomew must actually adhere to these written warnings. That’s how bad this process has become.

This is the value and consideration the DSHS has concerning victim safety. WADVPress, as a victims rights organization is disappointed by this favorable response to a clear and dangerous precedent they have established with this decision.  Public disclosure for past offenses along these lines with other DVPT programs have resulted in license revocation or worse. More of these past complaints along these lines will be published in the upcoming weeks, along with the exposure of the lack of procedures missing within the subjective DSHS WAC 388-60 complaint process.

→ 2 CommentsTags: