Washington DV Press

Protecting Victims of the Domestic Violence Industry

Washington DV Press header image 2

False Rape Witch Hunts Gone Wild

October 22nd, 2009 · 10 Comments

Since last year, we have been following another interesting false rape charge in a area of Maine which has an exorbitant amount of rape charges per its population size (60,000) They are averaging 4 rape charges per month.

The shameless tactics of Mary Kellett, and Michael Povich continue in the state of Maine. It makes one wonder what they are really doing in their capacities if they feel it necessary to prosecute every false allegation this vigorously.

Here is what they’ve been up to lately. These cases should be dismissed with prejudice. Instead, they enable the behaviors of this sick woman. Her name is Ligia Filler, and she is a man’s worst nightmare. Here is a sample of evidence that Ms. Kellett has been fighting hard to suppress.

The state of Maine, Michael Povich, and Mary Kellett are guilty of trying to block this evidence and the Filler’s continue to run out of money to help this poor man. This must stop and stop soon.

According to victims of prosecutions in Maine’s Bar Harbor region, what is taking place is a modern day Witch Hunt. Court documents suggest that numerous men are currently facing charges of sexual misconduct in a small county of little more than 50,000 people.At the center of these prosecutions is a 44 year old Assistant District Attorney Mary N. Kellett, who has a reputation for prosecuting men on questionable evidence and questionable probable cause.  As in the Salem Witch Trials, these prosecutions are often based solely on accusations with no physical or corroborating evidence.

Accusations against men in the county are widely publicized along with their pictures, identities, and details of their private lives.  Members of this small community, who make up the jury pool, are presented with the notion that when a prosecutor files numerous charges of sexual abuse that there exist a solid, or at lease a reasonable, basis in evidence to justify the arrest, detention, and a public prosecution of these men.

But the evidence presented in courts very often shows that any accusation made regardless of the evidence was used to prosecute the accused men.  Some local attorneys have asserted that county prosecutor Mary Kellett ignores evidence and the search for truth, but instead focuses on getting men convicted for the allegations made by women.  Kellett has made statements that she does not believe women lie about rape.  And even when some trials illustrate that the accuser engaged in consensual sexual activity, Kellett herself later characterizes the activities as punishment, done out of anger, and rationalizes why they were not consensual.

These beliefs are shared by the most extreme feminists who for years have asserted that all sex between men and women is rape, and that women just don’t realize that they are being raped even by their partners.  In Hancock County Maine, this extreme feminist philosophy is being put to practice by the District Attorney’s office.  The prosecutor treats female accusations as evidence and absolute truth.  A team of sex offense responders at the DA’s office immediately embrace female’s accusations and coach them through the process.  In the name of public safety, men are immediately stripped of numerous Constitutional rights and effectively forced to disprove the accusations against them in a public criminal trial.

The public’s notions that prosecutors are faithful guardians of civil rights and conservative discretion prove to be false in Hancock County.  In practice, the prosecutor’s credibility is publicly re-enforced solely through wide publicity of rare convictions.  The line between justifiable and unjustifiable prosecutions of men is blurred by selective media coverage.

Little if any publicity is given to the bulk of the cases involving men who were criminally charged and prosecuted with little evidence beyond accusations, sometimes made by their girlfriends, wives, troubled step children, or occasional sex partners.  These men may remain in jail for months, lose everything they have, sometimes can’t see their children, and never repair their reputations or the damage done to their lives.  No articles are written about how these men manage to put their lives back together, get employment after being falsely arrested and prosecuted for rape, or how vulnerable they become to future false allegations by other abusive females in their lives.

The prosecutors like Mary Kellett act with full immunity for their actions against men.

And it’s not just for alleged sex crimes for which men are systematically punished by the District Attorneys office in Hancock County.  Men in the community have been criminally charged for such alleged crimes as splashing water on their wives, spitting, for “terrorism” due to offensive song lyrics, visual aggression, and for what often can be viewed as any action against a female.  But at least those “crimes” don’t carry the stigma and a 30 year prison sentence which comes with each class “A” gross sexual assault charge, which is a frequent charge against men in Hancock County, and one of the easiest and most profitable for a prosecutor to undertake.

Dr. Demosthenes Lorandos, who is a psychologist and an attorney, states that “the crime of Rape has been known as the easiest criminal allegation to make by an alleged victim, and  the hardest to disprove by the defendant.”  And that “a series of bias laws has made it easier to obtain convictions”.

Not surprising that most of the innocent men who are exonerated by the Innocence Project through DNA evidence, sometimes after decades in prison, were falsely accused and convicted of rape.  Some studies have placed the rate of false sexual assault reports at 50% or more.  That rate jumps to almost 80% when accusations are made during divorce or child custody disputes with girlfriends or wives.

And yet in Maine, media coverage remain eerily silent about local false allegations and prosecutions of innocent men whose lives and reputations are destroyed as a result.  The female accusers are never named and continue to live in obscurity even after their accusations prove false.  Instead, the local reports graphically focus on covering the accusations against men, and at times even imply that the acquitted men have cheated justice.

One Bangor television station aired an interview with a local rape crisis center official who stated that even if a woman falsely accuses a man of rape, it is most important for law enforcement to believe the woman, act on her report, and do exactly what she wants them to do.  This implies that arresting, charging, and publicly prosecuting innocent men is less harmful than for authorities to question the words and motives of a woman making the accusations.  This appears to be the policy adopted in the Bar Harbor region of Maine.

Crime statistics for the region have consistently shown a low rape rate, yet not long after becoming a prosecutor, Assistant District Attorney Mary Kellett offered her own statistic of the Bar Harbor region.  Speaking to a local newspaper she stated that it could be difficult to find jurors in the area for sex cases because many people have been victims of sex offenses or have been accused of committing them.

An anonymous victim of prosecution by Mary Kellett stated: “I will never have any faith in the justice system. They aren’t interested in the truth. It’s a game for them. Some day this will go down as witch hunts.” “My family just wants to put this behind them. But it will never be over. I’m still receiving hate mail because of my support [for the accused]. [The prosecutor] used every unfair, low trick in the book to get a conviction and when a jury of 12 called him not guilty they then say ‘just because he wasn’t found guilty doesn’t mean he’s innocent’. I lock my doors and windows and turn the dogs out at night.”

One case which has received some attention is that of Vladek Filler, a husband who was accused of sexual assault by his wife during their bitter split up and custody battle. Filler, a self employed honors graduate from Babson College, decided to leave his wife after 16 years and get custody of his two sons.  Child Protective Services and Court investigations granted Filler temporary custody of his children.  His wife was found to be a threat and had her supervised visits with them suspended.

Prior to being arrested and charged for his wife’s accusations, Filler sought help from a local domestic violence organization which turned him away and chose to give assistance to his abusive wife instead.  Filler sought a protection order from court and his wife decided to drop the “nuclear bomb” of divorce and custody battles.  She accused Filler of abuse, child molestations, and spousal rape.  She demanded immediate custody of their children. A video about the events appeared on YouTube.

Despite absence of any corroborating evidence other than his wife’s accusation, the children were taken away, and prosecutor Mary Kellett had Filler arrested, charged, and eventually convicted.  What emerged after his January 2009 trial were revealing details of how prosecutions of men are conducted by prosecutor Mary Kellett and the Hancock County DA’s office.

Filler was apparently not allowed to present any evidence at all of the bitter custody battle, his wife’s troubled past, or her false claims of abuse in another custody battle with another man. nKellett, in turn told the jury “there was no evidence that the sexual assaults did not occur”, and placed the burden on Filler to prove his innocence.  Kellett suggested that if forensic and physical examinations were conducted they would impede justice in this case and that statistically Filler was more likely to sexually assault his wife than a stranger.  Aware that Filler was prevented from presenting evidence, Kellett repeatedly told to the jury that a child custody dispute did not even exist and therefore could not be a motive for false accusations by his wife.

When considering the disturbing details of the Filler case, one can’t help but to wonder how something like this could happen in our justice system. What is taking place in Hancock County Maine is extremism based on a myth that men are inherently bad, and are a threat to helpless and innocent women; that the State needs to punish and control men to maintain order within relationships and families.  This is not much different from how Puritans viewed women accused of witchcraft in their community.  The way men are being characterized in Maine has caused the public to be fearful and suspicious of men. Maine’s Attorney General Janet Mills, a former co-founder of the Maine Women’s Lobby, recently stated that her number one priority is domestic violence, and that “We need to send the message to boys and young men in Maine”. Such views from Maine’s top law enforcement official are made despite numerous credible studies suggesting that women are just as responsible, if not more, for domestic violence and child abuse.

Such gender biased rhetoric demonizes boys, men, and fathers and leads to the numerous falsely accused men to face years in prison and the perpetual skewing of domestic violence statistics.

So powerful is the myth against men, that despite difficult fiscal and economic times, the flow of funding to the domestic violence industry continues to be strong, as does the prosecution of men. The message of the rhetoric being sent to the girls in Maine is “blame the boys for everything and the State will do the rest”, so maybe the message to the boys in Maine should now be “God help you”.

Tags: DV Industry

10 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Helen // Oct 26, 2009 at 6:28 am

    Omg, you have been on the receiving end of what you’re hysterically going on about. Were you falsely (so you say) accused of rape? Beating your wife? Something has made you start this website. You’re too passionate about this, therefore protesting too much. So what pushed you over the edge? I really want to know. This site is disgusting in its attempts to portray women as vicious liars.

  • 2 jlukas // Oct 26, 2009 at 9:01 am

    Nope. Not me. But since when is raising false allegations as an issue, “going over the edge”? That would be analogous to me saying you were jumping in glee when the Hofstra and Duke false rape charges were never pursued. Is that what you did?

    WADVPress

  • 3 Shaydo // Oct 26, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    Helen,
    I was falsely accused of hitting my x with a baseball bat after I called 911 while I was being attacked, I didn’t do anything of the sort. She even told them I didn’t later after she sobered up . They still prosecuted and withheld evidence to boot. The idea that women can only lie when trying to protect a man is insulting to women’s intelligence and simply ridiculous. The real fact is women can be and in many cases are vicious liars.

  • 4 jlukas // Oct 26, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    My best guess, that IF Helen REALLY did show back up, that it would be with more insulting insinuations rather that FACT. Another hit/run job…..

  • 5 DJ // Oct 28, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    “So what pushed you over the edge? I really want to know. This site is disgusting in its attempts to portray women as vicious liars.”

    Gathering from your post it sound like you “really want to know”….like “OMG!”….like “I really want to know!”
    You know what I really want to know Helen? How many cats do you own?

  • 6 jlukas // Oct 29, 2009 at 9:40 am

    Hey! I’m an animal lover and have two wonderful cats of my own. I’d like to stick to FACT here. I’d like to think that it’s the “opposition” that would like to stay away from those tactics.

    Helen, you’re welcome to bring your facts, as I believe that I know who you are anyway. And, I’d like to think that my blogs at the Seattle Times were the nail in the coffin for your homeless shelter that takes away from the homeless, and makes DV “victims” of of them instead.

    WADVPress

  • 7 DJ // Oct 29, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    Right on. I too would like to hear FACTS from Helen instead of personal attacked. How someone can say such things as she has is beyond me.

    Can an article have any more facts and links included than the one here? My God, the woman was screaming “He molested my children” but it wa a lie. And all that Helen can say about this is “so you say” and personally attack the messanger?

    It just goes to show, how much hate people have towards men and fathers, that even when one has clearly been falsely accused, charged, and convicted, it still doesn’t matter so long at it’s the man getting abused and jailed.

    Thank you for this website and all the articles.

  • 8 jlukas // Oct 29, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    Right on and back at you. This is a repeated example of how the gender-feminists roll. They emasculate, insult, and show the true general nature of just who they are.

    Thank you for that example, Helen. It’s exactly why you are losing your funding.

    WADVPress

  • 9 DSC // Jan 30, 2010 at 6:21 pm

    This web site is so very true. I am a woman, yet never knew how vendictive and revengeful that a true Narcissistic woman could be. Our X-daughter in-law is now pulling her second accusations involving CPS. One in 2007 and one in 2009. The first was proven unfounded, and it looks like the second will, as well. With a Dr. exam the report came back poor personal hygiene (for the pre-schooler–no kidding?!) In the mean time it has cost thousands upon thousands of dollars for our son to clear himself of these false accusations. NPD’s can be very vicious—-will do whatever it takes to get what they want. I believe every word delivered through these articles—our family is a living nightmare because of it, for the past 3 1/2 years. In the mean time a 5 year old has undergone 2 pelvic exams already, and who knows what kind of questioning and talk has gone on preceeding the exams–her innocense has been robbed by her ill mother and maternal grandmother. God help us all. Hopefully the courts will wake up to these shennanigans going on with perverted women out there. Thanks for the great work you are doing.

  • 10 jlukas // Jan 30, 2010 at 6:25 pm

    Thank you for your kind comments. We try, but need the help of spreading the word. Please, do so.

    WADVPress

Leave a Comment